I was just checking the table "HA pairs with shared managed disks" and noticed some inconsistencies.
The Capacity-based license column lists E8ds_v5 without any footnote. So I assume it is supported in single-az and multi-az configurations.
However, some instance types like E8ds_v4 have footnote 4 which is explained as:
These VM types are supported for HA pairs in single availability zone and multiple availability zone configurations running on shared managed disks. For Ls_v3 VM types, multiple availability zone support starts from ONTAP version 9.13.1. For Eds_v5 VM types, multiple availability zone support starts from ONTAP version 9.14.1 RC1.
Question: Where is the difference between instance types with or without footnote 4? Are those without footnote 4 supported in single-az configurations only?
The Optimized column lists E8ds_v4 with footnote 3. Explained as:
These VM types are only supported for HA pairs in a single availability zone configuration running on shared managed disks.
Does that mean the E8ds_v4 instance with optimized license is only supported in single-az configurations? Because footnote 3 is not listed with thhe E8ds_v4 instance type in the Capacity based licensing.
Thanks,
Alex
Public issues must not contain sensitive information
Page URL
https://docs.netapp.com/us-en/cloud-volumes-ontap-relnotes/reference-configs-azure.html
Page title
Supported configurations in Azure
Summary
Hi team,
I was just checking the table "HA pairs with shared managed disks" and noticed some inconsistencies. The Capacity-based license column lists E8ds_v5 without any footnote. So I assume it is supported in single-az and multi-az configurations. However, some instance types like E8ds_v4 have footnote 4 which is explained as:
Question: Where is the difference between instance types with or without footnote 4? Are those without footnote 4 supported in single-az configurations only?
The Optimized column lists E8ds_v4 with footnote 3. Explained as:
Does that mean the E8ds_v4 instance with optimized license is only supported in single-az configurations? Because footnote 3 is not listed with thhe E8ds_v4 instance type in the Capacity based licensing.
Thanks, Alex
Public issues must not contain sensitive information