We're not using the NEAR contract developed as the aggregation registry (contracts/near/sffl-agreement-registry) currently and I'm not sure how close we'll get to using it soon. It's a nice alternative for an aggregator, but there are lots of considerations to use NEAR for this purpose, especially considering messaging rates. Currently, it's resulting in some security alerts in the repo, so IMO it's better to just remove it for now.
emlautarom1
commented
1 week ago
We're not using the NEAR contract developed as the aggregation registry (
contracts/near/sffl-agreement-registry) currently and I'm not sure how close we'll get to using it soon. It's a nice alternative for an aggregator, but there are lots of considerations to use NEAR for this purpose, especially considering messaging rates. Currently, it's resulting in some security alerts in the repo, so IMO it's better to just remove it for now.