Open rubo opened 1 year ago
why do we want to do this?
Also, would it be a good idea to separate our cryptography implementations (like Keccak, Blake2Avx2, etc) in a separate library? I also would be adding things related to verkle trees.
why do we want to do this?
For performance reasons.
Also, would it be a good idea to separate our cryptography implementations (like Keccak, Blake2Avx2, etc) in a separate library? I also would be adding things related to verkle trees.
There already is Nethermind.Crypto
for that.
For performance reasons.
when I was trying to implement verkle trees, i counld not find a better library for crypto in .net.
There already is Nethermind.Crypto for that.
I meant like a seperate nuget package
when I was trying to implement verkle trees, i counld not find a better library for crypto in .net.
BouncyCastle is very rich, you can find almost anything there. But not necessarily the most performant.
I meant like a seperate nuget package
That's also an option, especially if we need it in other projects as well.
Explore the possibility of replacing the BouncyCastle implementations with .NET's own ones or with already existing ones if any:
RandomContractTxSource.cs
EciesCipher.cs
EthereumIesEngine.cs
Ripemd.cs
EncryptionSecrets.cs
FrameCipher.cs
FrameMacProcessor.cs
HandshakeService.cs