Closed bitbeckers closed 1 year ago
Ah yes, but that's a metadata issue. We focussing on the minting flow first and you can see that the quality of the data ("Properties" field) is way better.
The issue is the reading of the contract name that OpenSea happily skips. I've added a screenshot to the original post
Thanks for your reply.
It seems like OpenSea is still relying on some old implementation of ERC-1155…
Adding a name
variable until OpenSea fixes that may be a solution.
Non-issue, contract used was a seperate testing contract. HypercertMinter is represented as expected.
https://testnets.opensea.io/assets/goerli/0xffb1fbff7a40ea441aeae8036812af116f593995/17