Closed rmarronnier closed 5 years ago
I have no idea why the specs fail on Travis :/
I guess we haven't really touched the CI part in a while, let me try to pass specs locally
Seems it fails on the rprop run, not the most stable one for sure.... we might want to remote Rprop from specs as it's a bad optimzer anyway, @ArtLinkov what say you?
Thanks for looking into this. All specs (except the ones already commented out in master) pass for me locally. It's strange that this one fails on Travis.
@rmarronnier first, let me say I'm happy you find SHAInet useful and thank you for contributing, Regarding the specs, if I'm not mistaken the rprop spec is the one that fails. In that case, you can just comment it out because it is quite volatile (converges fast but sometime to local minima) and doesn't work very well with small datasets
Thanks @ArtLinkov for the explanation. I commented out the failing spec. I hope it's not too essential and that it was not a safeguard against any possible regression.
@rmarronnier I believe it should be OK now. Merging.
I'm trying to learn about neural networks and this library is incredibly educational. Thanks for sharing this ! I couldn't help myself but made some fixes (mostly Ameba suggested) and replaced the
PtrMatrix
with the one fromApatite
. I saw no performance issues and could makeShainet
benefit from already written methods.Hope you find this weird PR useful :-)