Closed stephprince closed 5 days ago
@rly you mentioned you had a related test file, can you let me know if this solves the issue or share the file?
@rly this should be ready for you to test with your example file and review
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
Project coverage is 86.72%. Comparing base (
c26924b
) to head (38620ca
).
🚨 Try these New Features:
Motivation
Fix #528.
Recent Zarr-related updates switched the inspector from using
pynwb.validate(paths=paths)
topynwb.validate(io=io)
, resulting in the inspector not using cached namespaces during validation. We will temporarily revert this change, since pynwb validation of Zarr NWB files is not yet fully supported anyway due to pending issues that need to be addressed in hdmf/pynwb.Since this is more of a bug on the pynwb side that using the
io
argument ignores theuse_cached_namespaces=True
setting in the validator (and will be updated in the next major pynwb release), I'm not sure if there are really any specific tests to add here.While addressing this issue, I added a couple of other small updates to the Zarr support here:
inspect_all
that detected whether the path provided was a directory of NWB files or an NWB file.test_inspect_all_parallel
tests had been indented and were not running