Open NewGraphEnvironment opened 2 months ago
another example here is chris_culvert_id
mentioned. User only sees MoTi Chris Culvert ID
if applicable so perhaps quite confusing. Not to mention that we need to add fields here so that we can have more than one MoTi crossing added (prob better in another issue)
most the names of these fields need to be corrected as well as pointing the reader to where to find them. took a quick shot at correcting but more attention to detail likley needed to not confuse. will commit and link here.
There is no
site_id
in our field form. this is generated after we are back from the field withfpr::fpr_sp_gpkg_backup
need to tell user where to input "numeric ID based on the date (YYYYMMDD01 - example 2023070502 " and use the correct terminology for the names of the input fields (i.e -
Modelled ID
asCrossing - Modelled ID
does not exist in the form either (or at .) confusion seems to be coming from mixing together of the actual form (Form PSCIS
) vs an annual summary of the form used to process, QA and enter data into workflows (Form PSCIS 2023
). Guide needs to start with just the form and not need concern the user with the next steps as those can be dealt with later (if necessary). Generally, the next steps involving assigningsite_id
and other R related moves involving custom functions likefpr::fpr_sp_gpkg_backup()
are unstable workflows that are evolving each year so not really worth documenting too much at this point