Closed lucy-schick closed 1 month ago
what happened? - Prioritized after 2022 field work. During habitat confirmation in 2022 the survey crew did not recognize the falls at the crossing outlet as a fish passage issue that would not be rectified by replacing the culvert with a bridge. We went back in 2023 to sample to see what fish were using the system upstream and down and fortunately noticed the outlet drop/falls/cascade thing before fishing so called off the prioritization
In 2022 the modelled crossing 8300128 was assessed but bcfishpass linked it to the upstream modelled crossing 8302239.
8302239 is on the correct road.
the photos in the folder are the same as some of the ones in the pscis database 1 year newer. changed outlet and downstream photos (used ones from my camera) to better show the outlet drop and downstream canyon
road_tenure
should have the map_label
appended to the tenure holder NORTHPAC FOREST LICENCE INC. (Northpac R03780 6 )Need to update 2022 report with text and photos about what happened. Will make issue there and link to here. All changes made so will close on commit
This site seems odd to me:
8300128
) but in thepscis assessment layer
the site is linked to the upstream site (modelled crossing id =8302239
), maybe its linked to the wrong crossing.Here is what I think happened:
8300128
was assessed but bcfishpass linked it to the upstream modelled crossing8302239
. Need to change this using https://github.com/NewGraphEnvironment/bcfishpass/blob/main/data/pscis_modelledcrossings_streams_xref.csv8300128
because it was modelled as un-assessed due to the incorrect linking mentioned above. But put the pscis id198225
as the site number? Still not totally sure what happened here.