Closed lucy-schick closed 2 months ago
Fish point location is very important here as it is an indication of distribution limit at time of survey. At time of issue repoening the captured fish are reported within 58067_ds
but that site began at Wiggs Creek (1.1km upstream of the canyon/chute). the fish were captured within 58067_ds2
.
This needs to be changed in data/habitat_confirmations.xls
(aka. fish data submission ) so that coho don't show up as captured waaaay upstream in FISS.
Unfortunately, there is no mechanism for accurately goereferenceing fish in the fish data submission form (just the site UTM) so having the CO
show up near the Bulkley River will need to do. However, for our internal mapping purposes and data presentation on github we will custom input the UTM into scripts/tables.R
(within the hab_loc2
object) so that we get our fish point falling at the right spot.
Will do the custom UTM bomb in tables.R
but I think it will need to be redone when it is fixed in the fish data submission excel file (ie. habitat_confirmations.xls). Will reference this issue to try to make it easier to untangle afterwards.
going to fix this in main
branch version of habitat_confirmations.xls
so tables.R
can persist when the change is made in the other branch dealing with habitat_confirmations.xls
. Will ignore data/backup
csvs for now to try to avoid merge conflicts. git
can't see the actual habitat_confirmations.xls
so that shouldn't matter.
confirming that fish capture location is58067_ds2
in habitat_confirmations.xls
. will close
fish_observed_yes_no
was set tono
, changed toyes
chris_culvert_id