Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 8 years ago
Please note that 204 No Content, and others have no body either.
http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec4.html#sec4.3
"For response messages, whether or not a message-body is included with
a message is dependent on both the request method and the response
status code (section 6.1.1). All responses to the HEAD request method
MUST NOT include a message-body, even though the presence of entity-
header fields might lead one to believe they do. All 1xx
(informational), 204 (no content), and 304 (not modified) responses
MUST NOT include a message-body. All other responses do include a
message-body, although it MAY be of zero length."
Original comment by ls...@google.com
on 28 Sep 2010 at 2:32
Ok. The current issue is being caused by dpkt reading the rest of the data into
the body if the response header has a content-type header, which is wrong
according to the RFC. A simple fix is simply to remove those two lines.
Of course, this doesn't solve the larger issue. Making the response
intelligently decide whether to parse a body is tricky with dpkt's
architecture, because the parsing of the body and headers is done in the
http.Message superclass.
Original comment by andrewf...@gmail.com
on 28 Sep 2010 at 5:45
Attached is a patch to fix the issue:
1. Ignore content-type, as it does not say anything about the existence of a
body.
2. Do not attempt to read body if response status code is 1xx, 204 or 304.
3. Here comes the ugly part: ignore body if parameter head_response=True has
been passed to Response object. HEAD responses are identical to GET responses
(including Content-Length), except for the missing body. dpkt can not determine
automatically whether this is a HEAD response.
Also attached modified dpkt_http_bug2.zip:
- dpkt_bug.py: call dpkt.http.Response(data, head_response=True)
- stream.txt: file ends with '\r\n\r\n' (instead of '\r\n')
Original comment by matthaeu...@gmail.com
on 10 Jan 2014 at 5:11
Attachments:
Slight improvement: set body consistently to '' (empty string), avoid None.
Original comment by matthaeu...@gmail.com
on 12 Jan 2014 at 12:32
Attachments:
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
andrewf...@gmail.com
on 27 Sep 2010 at 10:40Attachments: