Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 8 years ago
300- is a good standard for a lot of modules... (jeti, futaba, frsky)
So really no reason to change it as DM9 uses it's own one....
BTW a module should not change the center as pauses changes...
Please open an issue with horizon hobby, DM9 acts out of any reasonable
standard.
Original comment by romolo.m...@gmail.com
on 11 Sep 2013 at 9:19
400 �s is an equally good standard for a lot of modules and polarity
doesn't matter,
So, no good reason not to change it.
I'm not going to open an issue with Horizon Hobby because I don't really
have a problem, just trying to help others.
Best modelling regards.
Jean-Marie Piednoir
Original comment by piednoir...@gmail.com
on 12 Sep 2013 at 5:51
Horizon Hobby has badly implemented a CPPM decoder in their module and you are
asking us a fix ??
So what about Futaba TM14 owner that require different length ?
We default to the most common one, specific needs can be adjusted by the user.
DM9 is not the most common one.
Definitively an invalid/wontfix issue.
Original comment by romolo.m...@gmail.com
on 12 Sep 2013 at 6:26
How much Horizon Hobby is ready to pay for us working in this?
;)
Original comment by bson...@gmail.com
on 12 Sep 2013 at 6:51
Okay, I get it.
Both Spektrum and Futaba have made a bad design and you've made a choice.
No problem with me since i am a dedicated FrSky user anyway.
Original comment by piednoir...@gmail.com
on 12 Sep 2013 at 7:05
I am a dedicated FrSky user anyway and don't care one way or another, just
tried to help others:
Spektrum users must suffer for their sins, I know, I know...
Original discussion on RC Groups:
http://www.rcgroups.com/forums/showpost.php?p=26083413&postcount=9907
Original comment by piednoir...@gmail.com
on 12 Sep 2013 at 7:12
Futaba has a good design, but TM14 requires a different standard length due to
possible 14 channels.
Conversely spektrum modules assumes a fixed length for interpause and measure
only raised part of the signal making a very stupid not standard implementation.
What about using a DM9 module in a graupner/jr radio that are at 300uSec
interpause as well ?
That's not matter of spektum user to pay for their sins, but to do not say
there is a defect on opentx/er9x while the defect is in DM9.
BTW people has two possibilities get the DM9 to work: adjust PPM interframe
and/or PPM center.
On opentx side we have given the maximum of flexibility, so this is
definitively a issue HH should solve and not us.
Original comment by romolo.m...@gmail.com
on 12 Sep 2013 at 7:37
Does anyone know what polarity and pulse width JR use in their radios? Is there
a default setting that can be changed or do they use a fixed polarity/pulse
width?
The reason I ask is because the Taranis is advertised as having a JR based
module. If any company has more weight than the others, wouldn't it be JR?
Original comment by jcansd...@gmail.com
on 12 Sep 2013 at 1:33
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
piednoir...@gmail.com
on 11 Sep 2013 at 9:08