Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 8 years ago
The proposed enhancement has some very dangerous drawback when applied to
engine.
0 ppm value on engine channel may be dangerous, as well as the command
returning to the master without leaving the master know it some way.
About validity check of the input I agree..
Original comment by romolo.m...@gmail.com
on 19 May 2013 at 5:43
It would be safer than now - currently it just stays where it is, or jumps
anywhere depending on what broken pulse arrived before disconnection!
You just really wouldn't want to put just a PPMx mix on the throttle channel in
the first place.
And if you did you'd use it as Replace, with my proposition as PPMx mixes would
get disabled when signal is invalid it would fall back to the default control.
That's not possible now.
About the command returning to the master all radios I know do that, it's
rather common to pull the cable during training by mistake. The cool thing
compared to those other radios is that we could add an audio warning/beep :)
Original comment by bernet.a...@gmail.com
on 19 May 2013 at 6:31
yes the audio could let the instructor know that trainer link was lost and he
had control..
This enhancement is very important because at the moment if we forget to
disable trainer mode for a model and flick the switch by mistake, we will most
likely lose the model. when we'd realize what happened, would be to late.
Just my 2c
Original comment by joaoalve...@googlemail.com
on 4 Oct 2013 at 6:23
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
bernet.a...@gmail.com
on 19 May 2013 at 5:21