Newcal / opentx

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/opentx
0 stars 0 forks source link

Potscroll acceleration too low. #39

Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 8 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago
Which board (stock / gruvin9x / sky9x / Taranis) are you using?
Sky9x Board Rev B1

What is your openTx FW version?
2281

What is your openTx EEPROM version?
214

What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. Download and Install OpenTx with Potscroll enabled.
2.
3.

What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
On er9x, and ersky9x, a quick flip of pot3 will jump all the way to either end 
of the range of values allowing quick adjustment, while slower movements will 
adjust in smaller increments.

In opentx the potscroll moves the values the same amount no matter how fast the 
dial is turned.  Depending on the start position of the pot when entering the 
menu full range of values will likely be impossible.

Please provide any additional information below.
Potscroll works as expected when entering letters in the model's name, I can 
jump to either end of the list of characters quickly and then adjust from there.

I hope this is an easy fix.  Many thanks to those who volunteer their valuable 
time.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by hi...@foamfly.com on 22 May 2013 at 6:50

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago

Original comment by bson...@gmail.com on 23 May 2013 at 9:22

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago
Right. Easy to fix. Are you able to compile an test once I will have commited a 
fix?

Original comment by bson...@gmail.com on 23 May 2013 at 9:22

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago
Yes,I should be able to compile. I'll collect the various dependencies now. 
What I'd a preferred environment, Linux or Windows? 

Thanks

Original comment by hi...@foamfly.com on 23 May 2013 at 12:24

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago
I prefer Linux (Fedora), but Windows should be ok as well!

Original comment by bson...@gmail.com on 23 May 2013 at 12:33

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago
Looks like compiling is harder than I thought.  I'm going to install a virtual 
machine with 12.04 32bit, since I'm on 64bit ubuntu, and the tools are all 
32bit.  Never cross-compiled before.

Original comment by hi...@foamfly.com on 23 May 2013 at 3:07

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago
Done. Tests needed.

Original comment by bson...@gmail.com on 26 May 2013 at 8:49

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago
I will get back to work on compiling. Once I get it to go the first time the 
rest should be easy. 

Original comment by hi...@foamfly.com on 26 May 2013 at 8:53