Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 8 years ago
That's a double-edged sword...
With the Weight/Offset approach it's easy to just change the weight when offset
is 0 (most common scenario), but a bit more complicated to calculate when you
have offset.
With the EP1/EP2 approach you'd have to figure out and adjust 2 parameters even
to just change a ratio...
If I want to set an output between 40 and 65 I'll just use a 3-point curve.
Having 2-point ones available too would be nice though.
Original comment by bernet.a...@gmail.com
on 14 Jul 2013 at 9:09
> With the EP1/EP2 approach you'd have
> to figure out and adjust 2 parameters even to just change a ratio...
Not sure I understand this. Since the end points would reference -100 and +100
values, they are intuitively expressed as ratios (percentages). People used to
other systems tend to think in terms of percentages, not gradients and offsets.
Having now used both systems (OpenTx and others), I know why.
The suggestion for using curves to set up an asymmetric response would of
course work, but it seems like using a sledgehammer to crack a nut. It means
(a) using up a named curve (limited resource) and (b) a further calculation to
determine the mid-point since 2-point curves are not available. All this makes
complex glider setups difficult to set up on the field.
Original comment by m.shel...@gmail.com
on 14 Jul 2013 at 10:39
I mean now when you want to reduce the ratio of a mix that has no offset from
100% to 80%, you just set the ratio to 80%.
With the EPs, you'd have to set EP1 to -80, then also EP2 to +80.
IMO the major manufacturers (maybe not MPX, but everyone else AFAIK) make it
more complicated, they give you 2 percentages for left and right but center is
always center. Some have an offset, but it then shifts everything up or down.
What may cause you trouble in calculations is that openTx applies the offset to
the input. To apply it to the output a clearer approach is to add a 2nd mixer
line with xx% MAX where xx is the offset you want to add to the output.
Original comment by bernet.a...@gmail.com
on 14 Jul 2013 at 10:51
... But on reflection I see your point too. I think allowing named curves with
2 points would be a good compromise and allow easy adjustment for the kind of
example i gave. Thank you for responding... and on a Sunday, appreciated!
Original comment by m.shel...@gmail.com
on 14 Jul 2013 at 10:52
Hy,
sorry, but calculation of Mixer is [(Source + Offset) * Weight] + Trimm
So for your example:
Range is from -100% to +100% = 200
you want a Range from -30% to +50% = 80 absoult
the mid from -30% to +50% is +10%
So calculate:
80/200=0,4 = 40% for Weight
+10/0.4=25 for Offset
so set
Weight =40
offset =25
and you got what you want
a Range from -30 to +50
Helle
Original comment by hrenz62...@aol.com
on 14 Jul 2013 at 5:36
Yes, my brain fade. One consequence of the (correct) formula is of course that
small ranges (low values for weights) require potentially very large offsets.
Original comment by m.shel...@gmail.com
on 17 Jul 2013 at 9:58
Nota: 2 points curves will also be part of the next MAJOR openTX release
Original comment by bson...@gmail.com
on 31 Jul 2013 at 9:56
2-point curves will help! Thanks for all the hard work :)
Original comment by m.shel...@gmail.com
on 31 Jul 2013 at 10:49
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
m.shel...@gmail.com
on 13 Jul 2013 at 11:35