Closed Zorono closed 2 months ago
@AmyrAhmady i thought omp-stdlib is fully backward compatible with samp-stdlib @NexiusTailer i kept on editing nex-ac.inc to fix these errors and warnings on every release myself... this is painful
You will be getting a lot of them even if you use latest versions of samp-stdlib. In order to overcome the issues you have with nex-ac, you can use
at the top of your script
You will be getting a lot of them even if you use latest versions of samp-stdlib. In order to overcome the issues you have with nex-ac, you can use #define NO_TAGS #define MIXED_SPELLINGS
at the top of your script
thank you very very much, you saved me from a lot of pain (i didn't remember about those definitions since i read that compatibility guide many months ago)
btw, there are some warnings regarding bool tags and constants on ShowPlayerDialog hook
Those happen on samp-stdlib as well, Nexius is responsible for not having it supported (rightfully so) you can just modify it in nex-ac or omp-stdlib
Those happen on samp-stdlib as well, Nexius is responsible for not having it supported (rightfully so) you can just modify it in nex-ac or omp-stdlib
@AmyrAhmady thanks for your help :D
please add support for https://github.com/openmultiplayer/omp-stdlib
This library was developed to be used with canonical (original) samp includes, so any backwards-incompatible changes like in samp-stdlib or omp-stdlib should be addressed there (as they claim they're fully compatible). The other way is to disable extra tags and enforced const-correctness by the method provided above, or just use samp includes.
please add support for https://github.com/openmultiplayer/omp-stdlib
This library was developed to be used with canonical (original) samp includes, so any backwards-incompatible changes like in samp-stdlib or omp-stdlib should be addressed there (as they claim they're fully compatible). The other way is to disable extra tags and enforced const-correctness by the method provided above, or just use samp includes.
it seems like a competition or war for me (your opinion vs there's) ??!
it seems like a competition or war for me (your opinion vs there's) ??!
No I just prefer to keep things as it is, like in any other library that was developed with original samp includes and now (as expected) it has issues on modified standart includes which changed some pretty basic and critical stuff. The more those libs change something comparing to the original samp libraries, the more issues they have with them. But it's not a question of this particular include.
it seems like a competition or war for me (your opinion vs there's) ??!
No I just prefer to keep things as it is, like in any other library that was developed with original samp includes and now (as expected) it has issues on modified standart includes which changed some pretty basic and critical stuff. The more those libs change something comparing to the original samp libraries, the more issues they have with them. But it's not a question of this particular include.
you have a point btw
please add support for https://github.com/openmultiplayer/omp-stdlib