NextCenturyCorporation / itm-scenario-validator

1 stars 0 forks source link

updated injuries/locations to match sim #27

Closed kaitlyn-sharo closed 4 months ago

kaitlyn-sharo commented 4 months ago

To test: Play around with different injuries in the test.yaml file, with and without training mode on

kaitlyn-sharo commented 4 months ago

I like what you did with adding unspecified to Laceration. Maybe we should do that will all injuries? Basically, we're letting scenario designers say it doesn't matter where the injury is, and we can choose what we want in the sim.

Done!

I'm confused about Abrasion. What is it in the sim and why is it identical to laceration? The only abrasion I know about is the "forehead scrape" which takes a pressure bandage.

We've discussed this before. I was told that Abrasion was the same as laceration (but maybe a little more extreme?) which is what I was messaging you about this morning. I don't think abrasion is necessary at all. Forehead scrape can easily be defined as a forehead laceration, in my opinion.

nextcen-dgemoets commented 4 months ago

We've discussed this before. I was told that Abrasion was the same as laceration (but maybe a little more extreme?) which is what I was messaging you about this morning. I don't think abrasion is necessary at all. Forehead scrape can easily be defined as a forehead laceration, in my opinion.

I'm sorry-- I didn't circle back to that text from this early morning. I don't see a problem with removing Abrasion entirely from the API, and if the YAML calls for a forehead laceration, we add a "forehead scrape" in the sim. Maybe we should double-check with @brianpippin first, though? I'll just need to remember to remove it from the swagger and the server. No MRE scenarios use Abrasion (shocking).