Do we want this in the UMM-CSci organization?

[NicMcPhee]

Paul took the initiative to put this up, which is super cool, and he did a good job of crediting all the people that were involved in the README. We could move it to the UMM-CSci organization if we wanted to so the URL would be UMM-CSci/Scavengr instead of Paul-Schliep/Scavengr. Personally, I don't care at all and am happy either way, but Paul asked about the possibility so I wanted to raise it here to see if people had thoughts or concerns either way.

[ianrbuck]

I would definitely like it to be under the CSci org, since this way it seems like Paul is the "owner."

On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 1:52 PM, Nic McPhee notifications@github.comwrote:

Paul took the initiative to put this up, which is super cool, and he did a good job of crediting all the people that were involved in the README. We could move it to the UMM-CSci organization if we wanted to so the URL would be UMM-CSci/Scavengr instead of Paul-Schliep/Scavengr. Personally, I don't care at all and am happy either way, but Paul asked about the possibility so I wanted to raise it here to see if people had thoughts or concerns either way.

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/Paul-Schliep/Scavengr/issues/7 .

[NicMcPhee]

If we do want it in the UMM-CSci org:

• Paul would need to add either KK or me as an admin/owner person on the project
• Then that person could transfer ownership to UMM-CSci

(I think – I haven't done all that much with organizations in Github.)