Open harrymattison opened 1 month ago
can you ensure that you don't implement Revit Api IexternalCommand and IexternalApp ?
I have one instance of Nice3point.Revit.Toolkit.External.ExternalCommand
and one Nice3point.Revit.Toolkit.External.ExternalApplication
The only "IExt..." in the project is IExternalEventHandler
also, it works fine with Revit 2024
A known problem on Revit 2025, the issue is that Revit doesn't want to load a dependency that is a higher version than the one already loaded. A temporary solution is to run DependenciesReport https://github.com/jeremytammik/RevitLookup/issues/269#issuecomment-2323309590 to find a plugin with an older version and copy Toolkit version 2025.0.3 to it
A known problem on Revit 2025
Does this mean that Nice3point/RevitToolkit should not be used with Revit 2025 unless the temporary solution is used?
find a plugin with an older version and copy Toolkit version 2025.0.3 to it
Could you explain in more detail what this means? What older version of which plugin would resolve this?
Does this mean that Nice3point/RevitToolkit should not be used with Revit 2025 unless the temporary solution is used?
you can, why not, you just need to update the plugins that use RevitToolkit with older versions, like 2025.0.1
Could you explain in more detail what this means? What older version of which plugin would resolve this?
Can you run DependenciesReport from the link above and send the generated report here so we can figure out the cause of the problem?
@harrymattison Update please RevitLookup to the 2025.0.10 version
Thanks, but how can I publish a product that will fail to load based on the version of some other product?
Toolkit gives more conflict protection than not using it at all. There are always chances to encounter incompatible plugins, Autodesk solves this problem, so we can only hope that they will do something in Revit 2026.
Hi Roman - I am getting this error when starting Revit 2025
But that DLL does exist in the folder with the add-in dll
CSPROJ.txt
Is there some other file that needs to be included? Thanks