Subjects for IG

[pieter-edelman-nictiz]

• Open world modelling; the zib fits in the FHIR profile, but the profile is wider.
• Conceptual cardinalities.
• mustSupport and the lack thereof (already in FHIR IG for R4).
• Profiles represent zib2020 "as-is", including its warts. Feedback should be directed to zib.
• zib vs. nl-core
• What are pre-publications?
• The notion that zib2017 maybe was a bit of an STU as well, and that we now have more formal and consistent approach.
• Release notes zib2017/STU3 vs. zib2020/R4
• Lacking MP profiles
• Per zib/profile, the special guidance and tough design choices:
  • zib NameInformation (initials and first names not implementable)
  • zib HealthcareProvider as Organisation
  • zib LaboratoryTestResult
  • Reversed references for zib MedicalDevice
• "Migration guide"
  • Eg. linking HealthProfessional (prev. PractitionerRole extension)
• Known issues?
• Profiling guidelines?
• ADA2FHIR?
• Handling binary data (see #352

[pieter-edelman-nictiz]

Ideas:

• Yet another separate document to read is not really helpful.
• Put overarching information in the Nictiz R4 Implementation Guide.
  • Possibly with expandable boxes for details to avoid cluttering the IG.
• Extract root comments using an XSLT and publish them in an overview on the wiki.
• Markdown file per profile? Only if this eventually is also published on Wiki, as this is our main publication mechanism at the moment.
• Other publication like the IG Publisher or Simplifier are possibly more suitable, but it's not helpful to adopt "another place" to publish stuff.

[pieter-edelman-nictiz]

Note: it would be nice if (optional) explicit guidance can be given towards builders of standards that use the zibs, in some circumstances.