Open kyleniemeyer opened 5 years ago
num_threads is a reasonable option name when actually specifying a number of threads, but when used without a number it just activates parallelized simulations and doesn't make sense.
num_threads
Perhaps a more clear name would be parallel?
parallel
num_threads
is a reasonable option name when actually specifying a number of threads, but when used without a number it just activates parallelized simulations and doesn't make sense.Perhaps a more clear name would be
parallel
?