Closed danieltudosiu closed 5 years ago
@ericspod what are we doing with this pull request?
So what should we do based on the Tensorflow Issue Unittest and test_session interaction #29439 response? Change the tests naming scheme so we do not use the non-OOP fix?
It wasn't our names it was theirs that was the issue. I say we keep our delattr solution for now.
Eric
On Thu, 13 Jun 2019, 14:59 Petru-Daniel Tudosiu <notifications@github.com wrote:
So what should we do based on the Tensorflow Issue Unittest and test_session interaction #29439 https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/issues/29439 response? Change the tests naming scheme so we do not use the non-OOP fix?
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/NifTK/NiftyNet/pull/380?email_source=notifications&email_token=AEHHUWQFHTNIZ34TQZ4LNY3P2JACTA5CNFSM4HTYIG5KYY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGODXTTMRY#issuecomment-501691975, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AEHHUWURWJ2FSKCQ7QDPKQDP2JACTANCNFSM4HTYIG5A .
Status
READY
Description
NiftyNet was tested if it works with Tensorflow 1.13.1/1.14.0rc0 and CUDA 10.0.130 with cudnn 7.5.
Types of changes
Todos
Impacted Areas in Application
tests | -most tests (too lazy to put 25+ files in the nice format I used)