I have successfully trained and inferred using densevnet, but I have an issue concerning the evaluation.
After I run evaluation and get the .csv file, I see that the numbers for n_pos_ref (Ground truth voxels) are not divided into separate labels, but seems to be an accumulative number of all three labels. The n_pos_seg (inferred voxels) work properly and are seperated into each specific label.
Why does this happen? I have tried changing evaluation_units to label, cc and foreground. I have checked that the histogram_ref_file is correct. I have tried changing label_normalisation to false. But no matter what I do, the n_pos_ref adds up all voxels from all my labels, I would like it to be in the same manner that n_pos_seg is presented.
Without dividing the labels into the correct label voxel volume I can not evaluate properly.
I have successfully trained and inferred using densevnet, but I have an issue concerning the evaluation.
After I run evaluation and get the .csv file, I see that the numbers for n_pos_ref (Ground truth voxels) are not divided into separate labels, but seems to be an accumulative number of all three labels. The n_pos_seg (inferred voxels) work properly and are seperated into each specific label.
Why does this happen? I have tried changing evaluation_units to label, cc and foreground. I have checked that the histogram_ref_file is correct. I have tried changing label_normalisation to false. But no matter what I do, the n_pos_ref adds up all voxels from all my labels, I would like it to be in the same manner that n_pos_seg is presented.
Without dividing the labels into the correct label voxel volume I can not evaluate properly.