Open codename1995 opened 1 year ago
Hi, I have some question on your work.
How can you get the waymo dataset's result? Because i just can get below result when i run the code for waymo dataset.
2024-04-15 12:24:41,593 INFO Average predicted number of objects(39987 samples): 100.000
2024-04-15 12:24:44.026785: I tensorflow/stream_executor/platform/default/dso_loader.cc:53] Successfully opened dynamic library libcudart.so.11.0
39987it [00:40, 990.05it/s]
results saved to /home/workspace/jisoocv/GD-MAE/output/kitti_models/graph_rcnn_po/default/eval/epoch_no_number/val/default/final_result/data/detection_pred.bin
2024-04-15 12:25:39,637 INFO
2024-04-15 12:25:41,141 INFO Result is save to /home/workspace/jisoocv/GD-MAE/output/kitti_models/graph_rcnn_po/default/eval/epoch_no_number/val/default
2024-04-15 12:25:41,141 INFO ****Evaluation done.*****
Hi,
thank you for your great work. It's highly inspired.
I do have a few questions though. I attempted to reproduce results on Waymo Open Datasets but the performance is a bit lower than reported in the paper. I am wondering is it caused by the adaption I made or I missed anything.
What I did are
SAMPLED_INTERVAL['train']
to 5 in both gd_mae_ssl.yaml and gd_mae.yaml.FILTER_EMPTY_BOXES_FOR_TRAIN
toFalse
for both pre-training and training in waymo_dataset.yaml. Otherwise I run intoRecursionError: maximum recursion depth exceeded in comparison
issue because GT boxes containing are always empty.What I obtained are
which is 1~2 points lower than reported in Table 4. Do you think it is caused by the reduction of batch size or it's a normal variation?
Later, I realized that the
FILTER_EMPTY_BOXES_FOR_TRAIN
(in step 3) can be set asTrue
as in the original code for (supervised) training. But the performance goes very low, like 0.06/0.06 for vehicles, 0.10/0.09 for pedestrian. I am wondering what should this variable be for pre-training and training?Thanks in advance.