Closed hamed-faraji closed 6 years ago
It seems right. I had read the part which says : But we do our explotation using Kmeans and mutation process is un affected because of random form. The above text make me to think we must use best exploitaion algorithm which means KMeans++ then mutation make our exporation. and
show us mutation is combination of current candidate and some other mixed candidates. So there should be no problem with mutation on fast convergence.
The real problem is here :
I repeat mutation for 3500 loops and I didn't see any difference in new fitness.this is because of fast convergence!! you know K-Means++ has near answer to K-MCI.so when we do mutation equation, it gives us centers with a lot of differences. Since the K-means centers are very near to optimal so new fitness is worse than K-Means++ fitness.
Holy shit. ;-)
It is 100% wrong to use k-means++ initial. because it causes very fast convergence and destroying Mutation role. as I see mutation doesn't influence data because of fast convergence. the paper doesn't point to k-means++ initial as you see: we need some exploring on data. not exploit.