Open NiniJiaying opened 3 years ago
The part of UG that the tester is refering to is shown in the screenshot below:
At the end of the sentence we state that this format may not be valid for certain commands
. The response that the tester received from the command does adhere to what is stated in the UG, since CS2103 p/56785678
is indeed taken as the value for the name parameter, and its format is invalid.
Team chose [response.Rejected
]
Reason for disagreement: [replace this with your explanation]
Team chose [type.DocumentationBug
]
Originally [type.FunctionalityBug
]
Reason for disagreement: [replace this with your explanation]
Team chose [severity.VeryLow
]
Originally [severity.High
]
Reason for disagreement: [replace this with your explanation]
Issue description
Followed the example on UG page 8 but it could not work.
Steps to reproduce the issue
What's the expected result?
What's the actual result?