NiniJiaying / pe

0 stars 0 forks source link

[addP command] Example given in UG could not be executed successfully #1

Open NiniJiaying opened 3 years ago

NiniJiaying commented 3 years ago

Issue description

Followed the example on UG page 8 but it could not work.

Steps to reproduce the issue

  1. type addP n/CS2103 p/56785678

What's the expected result?

What's the actual result?

nus-pe-bot commented 3 years ago

Team's Response

The part of UG that the tester is refering to is shown in the screenshot below:

image.png

At the end of the sentence we state that this format may not be valid for certain commands. The response that the tester received from the command does adhere to what is stated in the UG, since CS2103 p/56785678 is indeed taken as the value for the name parameter, and its format is invalid.

Items for the Tester to Verify

:question: Issue response

Team chose [response.Rejected]

Reason for disagreement: [replace this with your explanation]


:question: Issue type

Team chose [type.DocumentationBug] Originally [type.FunctionalityBug]

Reason for disagreement: [replace this with your explanation]


:question: Issue severity

Team chose [severity.VeryLow] Originally [severity.High]

Reason for disagreement: [replace this with your explanation]