Final Project 2/26 - Kinish Sathish

[KinerBoi]

Links:

https://github.com/NinjaBreadLord/t5_indochina_8195 https://ninjabreadlord.github.io/indochina/ https://everittcheng.tk/

Frontend: Project quality, running cross domain and no crashes on FE to BE with these reviews

• Project is good quality, works on both http and https, doesn't have crashes between the frontend and backend

UI contains inputs that are validated for garbage, data cleaned (ie validate DOB or Password)

• UI code shows how inputs are validated in a database response error; will be sent out if response is an error, otherwise it will allow for the recipe to be added to the database

UI contains actions for Create UI contains actions for Read

UI contains actions for Update, Delete JWT is guarding a feature, demonstration of cookies

• JWT is guarding the feature of the entire Recipe List

Backend: Individual Score for Code Review (binary criteria below, 5 points) Project quality, observation of comments in every function, class, or method reviewed. Be sure to review POJO, API Controller, and JPA. BE contains and API that shows that it handles error conditions (ie duplicate user id)

BE contains support for GET and POST methods

BE contains a database that supports Create, Read

https://ninjabreadlord.github.io/indochina/recipelist BE contains a database that supports Update, Delete

Assignment Part	Score (Self Grade)	P1	P2(	Average
N@TM Capture the Moment	2/2	2/2	2/2	2/2
N@TM Team Presentation	3/3	3/3	3/3	3/3
Project Quality	1/1	1/1	1/1	1/1
UI Contains Inputs	1/1	1/1	1/1	1/1
UI contains Create & Read	1/1	1/1	1/1	1/1
UI contains Update & Delete	0/1	0/1	0/1	0/1
JWT Guards a feature	1/1	1/1	1/1	1/1
Project Quality (has comments)	1/1	1/1	1/1	1/1
BE contains an API	1/1	1/1	1/1	1/1
BE has GET/POST	1/1	1/1	1/1	1/1
BE has a database for Create/Read	1/1	1/1	1/1	1/1
BE has a database for Update/Delete	1/1	1/1	1/1	1/1
Purpose/Theme/Quality	.5/.5	.5/.5	.5/.5	.5/.5
Video	0/.5	0/.5	0/.5	0/.5
Run Time Links	.5/.5	.5/.5	.5/.5	.5/.5
Readme	.5/.5	.5/.5	.5/.5	.5/.5
Blog, Guide for Review	.5/.5	.5/.5	.5/.5	.5/.5
75% of individuals have met full stack work	.5/.5	.5/.5	.5/.5	.5/.5
Individual Review Ticket	.5/.5	.5/.5	.5/.5	.5/.5
Runtime Links	.5/.5	.5/.5	.5/.5	.5/.5
Technical Accomplishments	.5/.5	.5/.5	.5/.5	.5/.5
Blog, Guide for Review	.5/.5	.5/.5	.5/.5	.5/.5
Full Stack, Backend objectives	.5/.5	.5/.5	.5/.5	.5/.5
GitHub Analytics	.5/.5	.5/.5	.5/.5	.5/.5
Total	18.5	18.5	18.5	18.5

Total: 18.5/20 points

Blog

[SanjayB06]

15/15 points. All elements are present in the project and therefore get full points on every line item.

[Gabrielboudreau]

All elements are present. 13/15. Individual contribution on nearly every aspect, except U/D.