Open QianaMmo opened 6 months ago
Application is waiting for allocator review
Since this is my first time onboarding this customer, and considering they possess the most cutting-edge technology data, I would love to approve the initial tranche.
I confirmed that the client is valid. I support the first round.
Total DataCap requested
10PiB
Expected weekly DataCap usage rate
500TiB
DataCap Amount - First Tranche
1PiB
Client address
f1fkj4rvntaqxptkccw4bl627uokrd2245lb3wnyq
f1fkj4rvntaqxptkccw4bl627uokrd2245lb3wnyq
1PiB
09cda19a-c955-4029-9060-ced0d17dfc9a
Application is ready to sign
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been approved by the Notary
bafy2bzacecxwlivrqux2p76nmdqc2txbuzp4k34t7hlme7qxcslbtd7d64flu
Address
f1fkj4rvntaqxptkccw4bl627uokrd2245lb3wnyq
Datacap Allocated
1PiB
Signer Address
f1a2lia2cwwekeubwo4nppt4v4vebxs2frozarz3q
Id
09cda19a-c955-4029-9060-ced0d17dfc9a
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacecxwlivrqux2p76nmdqc2txbuzp4k34t7hlme7qxcslbtd7d64flu
Application is Granted
checker:manualTrigger
⚠️ 1 storage providers sealed more than 90% of total datacap - f01782100: 100.00%
⚠️ All storage providers are located in the same region.
✔️ Data replication looks healthy.
✔️ No CID sharing has been observed.
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
[^2]: Deals from those addresses are combined into this report as they are specified with checker:manualTrigger
[^3]: To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ...
Click here to view the CID Checker report.
checker:manualTrigger
✔️ Storage provider distribution looks healthy.
⚠️ 80.00% of Storage Providers have retrieval success rate equal to zero.
⚠️ The average retrieval success rate is 9.66%
✔️ Data replication looks healthy.
✔️ No CID sharing has been observed.
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
[^2]: Deals from those addresses are combined into this report as they are specified with checker:manualTrigger
[^3]: To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ...
Click here to view the CID Checker report.
Client used 75% of the allocated DataCap. Consider allocating next tranche.
checker:manualTrigger
✔️ Storage provider distribution looks healthy.
⚠️ 100.00% of Storage Providers have retrieval success rate equal to zero.
⚠️ 100.00% of Storage Providers have retrieval success rate less than 75%.
⚠️ The average retrieval success rate is 0.00%
✔️ Data replication looks healthy.
✔️ No CID sharing has been observed.
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
[^2]: Deals from those addresses are combined into this report as they are specified with checker:manualTrigger
[^3]: To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ...
Click here to view the CID Checker report.
checker:manualTrigger
✔️ Storage provider distribution looks healthy.
⚠️ 88.89% of Storage Providers have retrieval success rate equal to zero.
⚠️ 100.00% of Storage Providers have retrieval success rate less than 75%.
⚠️ The average retrieval success rate is 7.09%
✔️ Data replication looks healthy.
✔️ No CID sharing has been observed.
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
[^2]: Deals from those addresses are combined into this report as they are specified with checker:manualTrigger
[^3]: To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ...
Click here to view the CID Checker report.
checker:manualTrigger
✔️ Storage provider distribution looks healthy.
⚠️ 88.89% of Storage Providers have retrieval success rate equal to zero.
⚠️ 100.00% of Storage Providers have retrieval success rate less than 75%.
⚠️ The average retrieval success rate is 11.24%
✔️ Data replication looks healthy.
✔️ No CID sharing has been observed.
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
[^2]: Deals from those addresses are combined into this report as they are specified with checker:manualTrigger
[^3]: To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ...
Click here to view the CID Checker report.
Thank you for selecting me as the allocator. To ensure smooth progress following the notary-governance guidelines, I kindly request an explanation for the anomalies highlighted in the CID Checker Report, specifically regarding retrieval rates. @QianaMmo
checker:manualTrigger
✔️ Storage provider distribution looks healthy.
⚠️ 88.89% of Storage Providers have retrieval success rate equal to zero.
⚠️ 100.00% of Storage Providers have retrieval success rate less than 75%.
⚠️ The average retrieval success rate is 17.84%
✔️ Data replication looks healthy.
✔️ No CID sharing has been observed.
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
[^2]: Deals from those addresses are combined into this report as they are specified with checker:manualTrigger
[^3]: To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ...
Click here to view the CID Checker report.
checker:manualTrigger
✔️ Storage provider distribution looks healthy.
⚠️ 88.89% of Storage Providers have retrieval success rate equal to zero.
⚠️ 100.00% of Storage Providers have retrieval success rate less than 75%.
⚠️ The average retrieval success rate is 15.14%
✔️ Data replication looks healthy.
✔️ No CID sharing has been observed.
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
[^2]: Deals from those addresses are combined into this report as they are specified with checker:manualTrigger
[^3]: To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ...
Click here to view the CID Checker report.
checker:manualTrigger
✔️ Storage provider distribution looks healthy.
⚠️ 88.89% of Storage Providers have retrieval success rate equal to zero.
⚠️ 88.89% of Storage Providers have retrieval success rate less than 75%.
✔️ Data replication looks healthy.
✔️ No CID sharing has been observed.
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
[^2]: Deals from those addresses are combined into this report as they are specified with checker:manualTrigger
[^3]: To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ...
Click here to view the CID Checker report.
@NiwanDao Thanks for @hawkinggg 's check, The rest of the report looks healthy, but retrieval is a big problem. I have communicated with the SPs, and most of them said that they didn't know much about retrieval before, and the unseals will be deleted after a period of seal, so these are hard to retrieve. Fortunately, f01999672, which has the largest deals sealed, can still support retrieval, and its retrieval rate looks good. I have beg them to support retrieval in subsequent deals, because if they don't provide retrieval, I will have no datacap quota, and they will lose the supply of datacap. ps: Is there any official website that can give a description of the datacap rules? It is hard for me to explain these things to them.
checker:manualTrigger
✔️ Storage provider distribution looks healthy.
⚠️ 88.89% of Storage Providers have retrieval success rate equal to zero.
⚠️ 88.89% of Storage Providers have retrieval success rate less than 75%.
✔️ Data replication looks healthy.
✔️ No CID sharing has been observed.
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
[^2]: Deals from those addresses are combined into this report as they are specified with checker:manualTrigger
[^3]: To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ...
Click here to view the CID Checker report.
checker:manualTrigger
✔️ Storage provider distribution looks healthy.
⚠️ 77.78% of Storage Providers have retrieval success rate equal to zero.
⚠️ 88.89% of Storage Providers have retrieval success rate less than 75%.
⚠️ The average retrieval success rate is 19.80%
✔️ Data replication looks healthy.
✔️ No CID sharing has been observed.
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
[^2]: Deals from those addresses are combined into this report as they are specified with checker:manualTrigger
[^3]: To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ...
Click here to view the CID Checker report.
Data Owner Name
AI Assisted Driving
Data Owner Country/Region
China
Data Owner Industry
IT & Technology Services
Website
http://myqhkj.cn/
Social Media Handle
http://myqhkj.cn/
Social Media Type
Other
What is your role related to the dataset
Data Preparer
Total amount of DataCap being requested
10PiB
Expected size of single dataset (one copy)
1PiB
Number of replicas to store
10
Weekly allocation of DataCap requested
500TiB
On-chain address for first allocation
f1fkj4rvntaqxptkccw4bl627uokrd2245lb3wnyq
Data Type of Application
Public, Open Commercial/Enterprise
Custom multisig
Identifier
No response
Share a brief history of your project and organization
Is this project associated with other projects/ecosystem stakeholders?
No
If answered yes, what are the other projects/ecosystem stakeholders
No response
Describe the data being stored onto Filecoin
Where was the data currently stored in this dataset sourced from
My Own Storage Infra
If you answered "Other" in the previous question, enter the details here
No response
If you are a data preparer. What is your location (Country/Region)
China
If you are a data preparer, how will the data be prepared? Please include tooling used and technical details?
If you are not preparing the data, who will prepare the data? (Provide name and business)
No response
Has this dataset been stored on the Filecoin network before? If so, please explain and make the case why you would like to store this dataset again to the network. Provide details on preparation and/or SP distribution.
Please share a sample of the data
Confirm that this is a public dataset that can be retrieved by anyone on the Network
If you chose not to confirm, what was the reason
No response
What is the expected retrieval frequency for this data
Sporadic
For how long do you plan to keep this dataset stored on Filecoin
1.5 to 2 years
In which geographies do you plan on making storage deals
Greater China, Asia other than Greater China
How will you be distributing your data to storage providers
Cloud storage (i.e. S3), Shipping hard drives
How did you find your storage providers
Partners, Others
If you answered "Others" in the previous question, what is the tool or platform you used
No response
Please list the provider IDs and location of the storage providers you will be working with.
How do you plan to make deals to your storage providers
Boost client
If you answered "Others/custom tool" in the previous question, enter the details here
No response
Can you confirm that you will follow the Fil+ guideline
Yes