Steam Deck support - Githubissues

Atemu commented 2 years ago

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe. A clear and concise description of what the problem is. Ex. I'm always frustrated when [...]

It is currently not possible to install Nix on the Steam Deck using the regular installer due to its special immutable rootfs setup.

Valve has left us with quite some options however:

We have superuser privileges
/etc is permanently writeable, including fstab and systemd units
Home is a bog standard read-write Unix filesystem (ext4) with quite a bit of space (depending on the model)

Describe the solution you'd like A clear and concise description of what you want to happen.

Ideally we could have Valve add an empty /nix/ directory to their SteamOS image. This way we could bind-mount a directory inside home onto /nix/ via a simple systemd mount unit and Nix could operate as usual.

IIRC we have tried to reach out to Apple regarding /nix on macOS before but that wasn't very fruitful (heh).
Going by their past behaviour, I imagine Valve might be much more cooperative on such matters.

Perhaps we could even reach out to them in an "official" manner via the NixOS foundation.
The Guix folks might also have an interest in joining our request with one for a /gnu/ directory.

Describe alternatives you've considered A clear and concise description of any alternative solutions or features you've considered.

It is probably possible to achieve a rw /nix/ without the help of Valve using overlayfs, selectively mounting /usr/ etc. onto a custom tmpfs root or worse hacks but those might not even be possible or might be fragile.

Additional context Add any other context or screenshots about the feature request here.

The Steam Deck has limited possibilities in extending it with your own software due to its read-only rootfs. You can't just install Arch packages via pacman for instance.
Flatpak is installed and enabled by default and it covers GUI apps fairly well but it doesn't cover CLI apps at all.

Nix could really shine here.

Enzime commented 2 years ago

I believe you can just run the following commands:

$ sudo steamos-readonly disable
$ sudo mkdir /nix
$ sudo steamos-readonly enable

However I believe this would get wiped out by Steam Deck updates, but it would probably be possible to write a systemd unit to set this up every boot

deliciouslytyped commented 2 years ago

There are some usual approaches for cases where there are restrictions:

something based on user namespaces
proot

See e.g. https://nixos.wiki/wiki/Nix_Installation_Guide

Atemu commented 2 years ago

Namespaced "solutions" are not good. They come with a whole range of issues. Most immediate of which is that you always need to enter a namespace before being able to run anything installed via Nix. This causes all kinds of headaches and that is not acceptable.

L-as commented 2 years ago

:+1: for the namespacing solution, I don't think there are much better solutions for this without heavily reworking how Nix works. (I can think of a few, but they are not trivial.)

e-minguez commented 1 year ago

https://determinate.systems/posts/nix-on-the-steam-deck

This (bind mounts and systemd units) is much more elegant than Valve adding an empty /nix dir for no reason.

Atemu commented 1 year ago

I was looking into their solution just yesterday, great to have a write-up.

I don't think disabling the read-only root is in any way elegant but, done in a service like this, it is a quick and dirty solution that works.

They linked @Xe's article on how to install Tailscale on the Deck though where they describe using systemd-sysext to install the tailscale binary and apparently that works without "cracking the readonly seal". Not sure whether sysext could create /nix for us though as it might be limited to stupid FHS dirs such as /usr but, should that work, sysext would certainly be an elegant solution; without Valve even needing to lift a finger.

Man, it's so great to have a (mostly) bog-standard Linux with bog-standard systemd and all its features on a friggin console.

e-minguez commented 1 year ago

I was looking into their solution just yesterday, great to have a write-up.

I don't think disabling the read-only root is in any way elegant but, done in a service like this, it is a quick and dirty solution that works.

They linked @Xe's article on how to install Tailscale on the Deck though where they describe using systemd-sysext to install the tailscale binary and apparently that works without "cracking the readonly seal". Not sure whether sysext could create /nix for us though as it might be limited to stupid FHS dirs such as /usr but, should that work, sysext would certainly be an elegant solution; without Valve even needing to lift a finger.

Man, it's so great to have a (mostly) bog-standard Linux with bog-standard systemd and all its features on a friggin console.

If they add FDE it would be awesome !

Edit: Link to the SteamOS repo issue asking for FDE https://github.com/ValveSoftware/SteamOS/issues/771

Hoverbear commented 1 year ago

Unfortunately systemd-sysext can't create a /nix, I did experiment with this! Unfortunately making the root temporarily writable is the best option I've found. Certainly interested in finding a new idea. :)

Nephyrin commented 1 year ago

SteamOS 3.5 will have a /nix/ directory available. Currently the nix package is not pre-installed, however.

Scrumplex commented 1 year ago

SteamOS 3.5 will have a /nix/ directory available. Currently the nix package is not pre-installed, however.

I assume this also means that it will be writable, then? Or will we need to mount our own partition there?

Atemu commented 1 year ago

SteamOS 3.5 will have a /nix/ directory available. Currently the nix package is not pre-installed, however.

That'd be amazing! Do you have a source for that?

Do they also ship /gnu/?

I assume this also means that it will be writable, then? Or will we need to mount our own partition there?

I doubt it'd be writeable but this frees us of having to create that directory in the read-only root which is the fragile part. We can bind-mount a rw directory on top at runtime without modifying the data on-disk.

Nephyrin commented 1 year ago

That'd be amazing! Do you have a source for that?

Source is myself, being a SteamOS developer! It is configured via the holo-nix-offload package, which you can peep the source of on the mirror at https://steamdeck-packages.steamos.cloud/archlinux-mirror/sources/jupiter-main/holo-nix-offload-0.1-1.src.tar.gz

If you try the (often unstable!) Main branch of SteamOS you can test it out.

Do they also ship /gnu/?

Not currently, but would be trivial to add

I assume this also means that it will be writable, then? Or will we need to mount our own partition there?

It is currently bind-mounted to the data partition at /home/.steamos/offload/nix/ along with other 'offload' directories that are independent of OS update (unlike the small/volaile /var which undergoes a selective migration on update).

I would also be interested in opinions on having the nix arch package installed by default in SteamOS builds. SteamOS tends to ship a minimal set of OS packages and rebase on arch with month(s) of latency, so it could be detrimental 'helpfully' pre-ship a potentially-old Nix binary. Does Nix have a good self-replacing-with-nixpkgs-nix story in that case?

Hoverbear commented 1 year ago

@Nephyrin You might be able to ship a minimal nix which users could nix upgrade-nix to get a recent copy?

A side note, we added support for the new /home/.steamos/offload/nix recently in our nix-installer crate (https://github.com/DeterminateSystems/nix-installer/pull/495) and it works really great! We did have an issue someone raised about wanting to use nix from an sdcard though (https://github.com/DeterminateSystems/nix-installer/issues/509), so we may need to tweak support. Feel free to try it out (off the main branch at this moment)

curl --proto '=https' --tlsv1.2 -sSf -L https://install.determinate.systems/nix/branch/main | sh -s -- install

(I should note if you do, to uninstall before rolling back to an old SteamOS branch. Things will break)

Atemu commented 1 year ago

Source is myself, being a SteamOS developer!

Oh! Well, that's a rather good source then :D

Thanks a bunch for considering us <3

If you try the (often unstable!) Main branch of SteamOS you can test it out.

I'm personally short in time for the next ~month but I'm sure others will try it on their Decks.

Not currently, but would be trivial to add

I'm sure the Guix folks would appreciate that! Much of the same that applies to us applies to them aswell as the projects are quite similar on a fundamental level.

It is currently bind-mounted to the data partition at /home/.steamos/offload/nix/ along with other 'offload' directories that are independent of OS update

That sounds like a sane strategy. It'd be great if the user could choose where the offload directory is located physically like @Hoverbear mentioned; some users might want Nix on the SD card.
Though technical users could of course just set up fstab/mount units to accommodate that and Nix users are very likely to be technical.

I would also be interested in opinions on having the nix arch package installed by default in SteamOS builds.

This could be done but I don't think it's necessary. Unless you plan to make use of Nix within SteamOS, I don't think every SteamOS user needs Nix. The Nix package itself has a significant size and pulls in quite a few dependencies, some of which even most Nix users do not need (such as the AWS SDK).
The ones who do need/want Nix will be able to install it themselves just fine as long as /nix/ exists and /etc can be modified for environment glue.

Nix shouldn't really be managed by another package manager anyways IMHO; it's its own package manager afterall and stays out of the way of the "host" system as much as it can.

SteamOS tends to ship a minimal set of OS packages and rebase on arch with month(s) of latency, so it could be detrimental 'helpfully' pre-ship a potentially-old Nix binary.

I don't think that'd cause any real issues. Nix is quite conservative when it comes to compatibility and stays backwards compatible. You can still eval the current Nixpkgs with a Nix build from 2019 and I'm sure even earlier builds work too.

Just a few months wouldn't be anything to be concerned about, other than security etc. which always applies.

Ericson2314 commented 1 year ago

Oh good. I've been hoping Nix would show up on Valve's radar for a very long time.

Does Nix have a good self-replacing-with-nixpkgs-nix story in that case?

Potentially :). There is an experimental nix upgrade-nix command, for example.

You can ship a single statically linked binary of Nix and it works, so in some sense this is thankfully not too hard a problem. But for configuring the system to be able to use all of Nix's features, it gets harder. Thankfully, there are new/upcoming features like the auto-allocate-uids configuration option that obviate needing to configure the underlying system for such features; I certainly hope we can continue down that route so installing Nix becomes successively more trivial.

@Nephyrin I am happy to answer any further questions / otherwise assist in any way I can. I am sure others from the Nix team besides myself would similarly be interested too.

Enzime commented 1 year ago

As a Steam Deck owner I would love to see Nix pre installed, I think there will definitely be utility as users can run programs without having to install them. The good thing about SteamOS being based on Arch is they can use the Arch Nix package as an easy bootstrap.

I just tested Nix on Arch, and I agree one potential blocker would be that Nix pulls in AWS SDK as a dependency which is 500MB, the rest of Nix and its dependencies are only like 100MB. I think it would be worth making AWS SDK an optional dependency as from what I saw it was only used for S3 binary stores, and it would reduce the upfront storage cost for users.

Another issue is that nix upgrade-nix only works when Nix is installed from a profile, whereas the Arch package installs it to /usr/bin and the Arch Nix Daemon service uses /usr/bin/nix. I’m not sure what the best solution for improving the upgrade-nix on Arch (and SteamOS) is.

If there’s interest on the Nix team side, I’d be happy to work on these issues.

Ericson2314 commented 1 year ago

The AWS SDK is already an optional dependency, actually. See the various ENABLE_S3 in the Nix codebase.

I don't think it makes sense for Nix to know how to uninstall the Arch Nix package, but any version of Nix is capable of installing Nix via Nix, and we could try to somehow make sure the Arch is "shadowed" the newly installed Nix (e.g. PATH order and whatnot).

Still, such shadowing is a bit fragile. Do you have a link to the Arch Nix package? I'd be curious to see what it does and doesn't do. That will help inform how much value we get out of it versus something else.

Enzime commented 1 year ago

Oh, I totally missed that, I wonder if people would be willing to change the default to false to reduce the closure size.

Here's the source files for the Nix package:

https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/packaging/packages/nix

Ericson2314 commented 1 year ago

Thanks @Enzime.

I'll go through the files in here

https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/packaging/packages/nix/-/blob/main/nix.conf

Needed for build-users-group today. Could do auto-allocate-uids instead, but still need file for that.

Easy to create /etc/nix/nix.conf ourselves, however.

https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/packaging/packages/nix/-/blob/main/sysusers.conf

Setting up build users and groups. Can drop entirely with auto-allocate-uids.

https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/packaging/packages/nix/-/blob/main/tmpfiles.conf

Setting up some state directories. Still need those directories, but I think can be done by Nix itself on startup. File shouldn't be needed.

https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/packaging/packages/nix/-/blob/main/user.environment.conf

Unneeded. The users of Nix can set PATH themselves. NIX_REMOTE=daemon will be auto-detected. NIX_PATH is purely optional, can also be set by users if they want it.

https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/packaging/packages/nix/-/blob/main/user.tmpfiles.conf

Unneeded. Since Nix 2.15 all of this stuff is within the user's home directory, and will be created as needed on demand.

https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/packaging/packages/nix/-/blob/main/PKGBUILD

Main file. Nothing that interesting but installing the other files.

Ericson2314 commented 1 year ago

So in conclusion, I don't think there is much extra value being gotten from the Arch Nix installer. The main point of system integration we don't currently have a replacement for is integrating with the systemd configuration, but with https://github.com/NixOS/nix/pull/5380 even the Nix daemon can just be run as non-root, making the systemd configuration a good bit lower stakes.

Atemu commented 1 year ago

@Ericson2314 just so there's no misunderstanding, we can freely modify /etc/ on SteamOS. All the stuff the regular Nix installer configures (users, shells, systemd units, nix.conf etc.) just works like it does everywhere else. The only thing we're unable to do (without disabling readonly) is the creation of /nix/ which apparently SteamOS now does for us.

Nephyrin commented 1 year ago

I think the benefit of including a pre-installed nix binary would be the ability to simply start using nix without fetching a web installer, but as the self-upgrade/replacing-system-binary story isn't great as-is my feeling is it wouldn't be helpful as a whole. (I also wasn't able to get the Arch packaging of Nix working on my system easily here, running into search path errors and requiring fiddling with NIX_PATH, I get the feeling using the official installer is much better tested ground)

For Steam Deck, Perhaps bundling some kind of nix-install script that embeds the curl web.site | sh -s ... fun while maintaining a chain of trust would be the way to go?

I see the official https://nixos.org/nix/install script already includes some hash checks and may fit the bill there as-is -- or we could add another layer of fetching the 'current' install script with a signature check, depending on how stable the installer is.

Ericson2314 commented 1 year ago

Yes chain of trusts with installers can definitely work.

Also to @Atemu's point, it is precisely because the Arch installer could do arbitrary things that commands like nix upgrade-nix are wary of clobbering it. A pre-install that puts nix in /nix/store/... not /usr/bin will not trigger those cautious aborts, and self-upgrade path works just fine in that case.

In a way, these are not that different. A signed/trampolined installer or pre-installed Nix without involving Arch both lead to basically the same place, and if a user wants to do a self-upgrade to a newer version of Nix form there, that is the same process too.

bertogg commented 1 year ago

@Atemu

we can freely modify /etc/ on SteamOS. All the stuff the regular Nix installer configures (users, shells, systemd units, nix.conf etc.) just works like it does everywhere else.

I think that there's an additional problem: the installer script does put the systemd unit files in /etc/systemd, but they are symlinks to the actual files under /nix. Those files are however not available until systemd mounts /nix, so the symlinks are dead and therefore ignored when systemd reads its configuration at boot time (it does work if you reload the systemd configuration after /nix is mounted).

This does not affect single-user mode as far as I can tell, and Nix seems to work just fine in that scenario.

However I suppose that it would also be nice if both the root and deck users can run software installed with Nix. Is that only possible if Nix is running in multi-user mode, or is there any other alternative?

Atemu commented 1 year ago

Thank you for pointing that out @bertogg. That would indeed not work.

Although I see little reason for root to run nix tools, multi-user Nix is the only well supported option, so we do need multi-user.

NixOS gets around this issue by mounting /nix in the initrd IIRC but I'm not familiar with how that's done in the new systemd initrd.

A simple way around this issue would be to copy the file rather than symlinking. A similar thing is done on macOS for the org.nixos.nix-daemon.plist because /nix is mounted separately too. I'm not sure how nix upgrade-nix works in this case though as it must have a hook to update the file?

bertogg commented 1 year ago

The general issue would be "Support installations where /nix is not in the root filesystem", as this could conceivably happen anywhere.

At first sight I can also think of two possible solutions:

Copy the files as you say and make sure that they are updated if Nix is upgraded.
Reload the systemd configuration (the solution proposed in this post does that), but that might be tricky to implement in a generic way (i.e. not only for SteamOS). I also don't like the idea of a systemd unit running systemctl daemon-reload, maybe it's supported but intuitively it feels hackish and error prone.

Nephyrin commented 1 year ago

Do they also ship /gnu/?

A quick check here shows that the guix installer needs a bit more interaction with the system than just a /gnu mount available, so it's not clear if this would be useful standalone. If any guix folks are interested in pushing on this let us know

alkazar commented 1 year ago

ChimeraOS dev here. This is a really interesting idea. Would it be helpful to mount /nix as a read-write BTRFS subvolume? We do this for /home and /var already.

ChimeraOS is also an immutable OS based on Arch, but pushes updates more frequently. Usually once a month. In such a case, would it be useful to include the nix Arch package? Or would it still get in the way?

SuperSandro2000 commented 1 year ago

gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/packaging/packages/nix/-/blob/main/nix.conf

Since contributing to arch is not as easy as just opening a MR on their GitLab can someone remove the line suggesting that disabling sandbox is a good idea? Thanks!

nckx commented 1 year ago

A quick check here shows that the guix installer needs a bit more interaction with the system than just a /gnu mount available, so it's not clear if this would be useful standalone.

Which interaction(s) in particular are problematic?

We're talking about guix-install.sh, right?

If any guix folks are interested in pushing on this let us know

Nice. Have you advertised this offer anywhere else? You're very welcome to post to guix-devel @ gnu.org.

If you don't have time, I'd be happy to share a link to this discussion.

I'm not much of a gamer and don't own a Steam Deck, but I do think they're awesome and want to see them succeed in their current, open form. Thanks for being part of the community!

bertogg commented 1 year ago

@nckx if you don't mind please share the link to guix-devel.

Problems that I noticed when installing Guix on the Steam Deck (assuming that /gnu is a bind mount to a writable place with enough empty space):

Unlike Nix, Guix expects that the root filesystem is writable and installs files (symlinks) such as /usr/local/bin/guix, /usr/local/share/info/* and a couple of shell completion scripts (/usr/share/fish/vendor_completions.d/guix.fish, /usr/share/zsh/site-functions/_guix). I haven't seen a way to opt out of those files.

In addition to that, the tarball with the distribution (guix-binary-*.tar.xz) is also a problem because it is unpacked in the root directory and contains a ./ entry:

$ tar --extract --file guix-binary-1.4.0.x86_64-linux.tar.xz -C /
tar: .: Cannot utime: Read-only file system
tar: .: Cannot change ownership to uid 0, gid 0: Read-only file system
tar: Exiting with failure status due to previous errors

This can be worked around by making the rootfs read-write before running guix-install.sh. However:

A SteamOS system update replaces the contents of the root filesystem (/etc is preserved) so all those extra files installed by Guix disappear. The /usr/local/bin/guix symlink is the main problem because it will be gone after an update.

On the positive side the systemd units installed by Guix are not symlinks so they don't have the problem mentioned earlier in this thread: https://github.com/NixOS/nix/issues/7173#issuecomment-1609822014.

podiki commented 1 year ago

Hello! Also from Guix and I do have a Steam Deck. I even booted a Guix USB stick when I first got it but haven't tried putting Guix as a package manager on there. Would be happy to help test and contribute on this front.

nckx commented 1 year ago

Edit: bright fellow that I am I noticed too late that this is the NixOS issue tracker, not SteamOS's. We Guixers should probably stop hijacking it. Sorry.

@bertogg It was an e-mail address all along! We're old-school.

Unlike Nix, Guix expects that the root filesystem is writable and installs files

These aren't strictly necessary: they are there to allow each user to bootstrap their first ‘guix pull’. There are other, less user-friendly ways to do so.

Does SteamOS have any root-writable directory in $PATH?

the tarball […] contains a ./ entry

I think/hope the fix for this was trivial.

bertogg commented 1 year ago

@bertogg It was an e-mail address all along! We're old-school.

Yes, I probably wasn't clear, sorry, I meant that you can post a link to this discussion to that mailing list if you want. I will keep an eye at the discussion and if there is additional information that I can provide I'll just reply there. This way we can stop hijacking this issue tracker :-) Or open a new issue in the SteamOS issue tracker, although I think this is best discussed among Guix developers.

These aren't strictly necessary: they are there to allow each user to bootstrap their first ‘guix pull’. There are other, less user-friendly ways to do so.

Does SteamOS have any root-writable directory in $PATH?

Unfortunately, no. $PATH only contains directories in the root filesystem. But even if it had directories elsewhere I suppose I would try to look for a solution that is as generic as possible so it has more chances to work on other systems. The way Nix seems to handle this is by updating $PATH in /etc/bashrc to point to /nix/var/nix/profiles/default/bin.

In case it is useful for Nix / Guix development, it is very easy to install SteamOS in a virtual machine and reproduce these problems there, here is a guide:

https://blogs.igalia.com/berto/2022/07/05/running-the-steam-decks-os-in-a-virtual-machine-using-qemu/

samueldr commented 1 year ago

Hi, uh...

You should all know that I have had an ~~official?~~ word about this for a long while.

Vagueposted about the offload package appearance here

20230426.1000 might be a new milestone for Nix adjacent things... Maybe more about that later...
7:44 PM · Apr 26, 2023

https://twitter.com/samueldr/status/1651371723588091908

Then reached-out for a word, hopefully I'm not overreaching by sharing these quotes outright. Emphasis mine.

Tue, May 2, 2023

To give some more background here, we have been exploring/discussing what a system with the robustness guarantees of a read-only A/B system but the flexibility of a more traditional linux environment might look like. For instance, tools like Nix and Distrobox offer approaches to separating the base OS from developer/tooling/etc. environments, while Flatpak and AppImage (and I guess Snap) offer a path for distributing more end-user oriented software outside the system package manager, and so on. The hope is that making tweaks to improve compatibility with such tools encourages the community to explore their usage more and unblocks some use-cases in the short term.

(It's been noted that Nix is actually a good vector for installing podman/distrobox in a rootless manner, as well)

In that light, the holo-nix-offload package was intended to be a minor change that allows the /nix toplevel directory to be remapped to the home/data partition, removing the need to toggle the read-only state of the rootfs or use nonstandard nix roots. It was not intended to be everything required for Nix usage, nor an official promise of any future support, just a small tweak to make it easier for those who do wish to play with Nix on their devices without OS updates interfering. You're correct that currently we don't currently pre-install the Nix package, so users would still need to use the out-of-band installer or otherwise.

If we were to communicate this publicly, it would likely just be a patch note under a 'for developers' section roughly noting the above, and making clear that it is not equivalent to official/full/proper Nix support.

So it's not support by Valve, but what I would call an affordance. They make it so you can have your cake and eat it too. In other words, keep using their read-only A/B system, and yet still make it possible to use Nix ecosystem things.

A bit off-topic for the Nix repository, but for anything in the Nix/NixOS ecosystem related to Steam Deck and Steam OS, you should ping at least me. There is also Jovian-NixOS that may be relevant in some form here, but a different thing altogether. Apparently I've not been loud enough about this project!

bertogg commented 1 year ago

@Atemu

A simple way around this issue would be to copy the file rather than symlinking.

FWIW the DeterminateSystems Nix installer uses the daemon-reload approach:

https://github.com/DeterminateSystems/nix-installer/blob/v0.12.0/src/planner/steam_deck.rs#L270

Hoverbear commented 1 year ago

We do! Since the Nix store gets bind mounted, some systemd units aren't available at systemd daemon startup time (the symlinks exist but are dead), but once the mount units fire those symlinks now point to real files, so we need the daemon to reload to find those files and include them!

It feels gross and dirty, but it does work!

al12gamer commented 1 year ago

@Atemu

A simple way around this issue would be to copy the file rather than symlinking.

FWIW the DeterminateSystems Nix installer uses the daemon-reload approach:

https://github.com/DeterminateSystems/nix-installer/blob/v0.12.0/src/planner/steam_deck.rs#L270

So, wait, does this mean I can install nix pkgs fine on steam deck by just running the DeterminateSystems installer?

grahamc commented 1 year ago

Yep!

On Sun, Oct 8, 2023, at 9:08 PM, Alex wrote:

@Atemu https://github.com/Atemu

A simple way around this issue would be to copy the file rather than symlinking.

FWIW the DeterminateSystems Nix installer uses the daemon-reload approach:

https://github.com/DeterminateSystems/nix-installer/blob/v0.12.0/src/planner/steam_deck.rs#L270

So, wait, does this mean I can install nix pkgs fine on steam deck by just running the DeterminateSystems installer?

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/NixOS/nix/issues/7173#issuecomment-1752225656, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAASXLAQSRU53WFB7TQLHLLX6NE7LAVCNFSM6AAAAAARFNJZT2VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMYTONJSGIZDKNRVGY. You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: @.***>

al12gamer commented 1 year ago

SteamOS 3.5.5 hit yesterday I believe. I'll have to see soon if this means we can just run the nix env installer.

DraconicNEO commented 12 months ago

SteamOS 3.5.5 hit yesterday I believe. I'll have to see soon if this means we can just run the nix env installer.

Have you tried yet? I know this is relatively new and I haven't seen many developments on it but hoping we'll be able to use Nix in an official capacity that isn't broken by updates soon.

bertogg commented 12 months ago

The official Nix installer won't work in daemon mode because of the problem discussed here: https://github.com/NixOS/nix/issues/7173#issuecomment-1609822014

The DeterminateSystems installer does work, and so does the official installer in single-user mode.

necrophcodr commented 11 months ago

The official Nix installer won't work in daemon mode because of the problem discussed here: #7173 (comment)

The DeterminateSystems installer does work, and so does the official installer in single-user mode.

I've tried the single-user mode of the official installer, and I cannot confirm that it works. What parameters did you specify to make it work at all?

To clarify: it needs sudo access to work. This is not a given on a distribution such as SteamOS.

Atemu commented 11 months ago

SteamOS has sudo. You need to set a password first IIRC. I'm sure there are tonnes of guides on the internet on that.

bertogg commented 11 months ago

I've tried the single-user mode of the official installer, and I cannot confirm that it works. What parameters did you specify to make it work at all?

(deck@steamdeck ~)$ grep _ID /etc/os-release 
VARIANT_ID=steamdeck
VERSION_ID=3.5.5
BUILD_ID=20231116.2

(deck@steamdeck ~)$ sudo chown deck:deck /nix
[sudo] password for deck: 

(deck@steamdeck ~)$ wget https://nixos.org/nix/install
[...]

(deck@steamdeck ~)$ sh ./install --no-daemon
downloading Nix 2.19.1 binary tarball [...]
performing a single-user installation of Nix...
copying Nix to /nix/store.................................................
installing 'nix-2.19.1'
building '/nix/store/7kk5lwf8qmnplp54xa6hxzr1kq5zx8jw-user-environment.drv'...
unpacking channels...
modifying /home/deck/.bash_profile...

Installation finished!  To ensure that the necessary environment
variables are set, either log in again, or type

  . /home/deck/.nix-profile/etc/profile.d/nix.sh

in your shell.

al12gamer commented 11 months ago

I've tried the single-user mode of the official installer, and I cannot confirm that it works. What parameters did you specify to make it work at all?

(deck@steamdeck ~)$ grep _ID /etc/os-release 
VARIANT_ID=steamdeck
VERSION_ID=3.5.5
BUILD_ID=20231116.2

(deck@steamdeck ~)$ sudo chown deck:deck /nix
[sudo] password for deck: 

(deck@steamdeck ~)$ wget https://nixos.org/nix/install
[...]

(deck@steamdeck ~)$ sh ./install --no-daemon
downloading Nix 2.19.1 binary tarball [...]
performing a single-user installation of Nix...
copying Nix to /nix/store.................................................
installing 'nix-2.19.1'
building '/nix/store/7kk5lwf8qmnplp54xa6hxzr1kq5zx8jw-user-environment.drv'...
unpacking channels...
modifying /home/deck/.bash_profile...

Installation finished!  To ensure that the necessary environment
variables are set, either log in again, or type

  . /home/deck/.nix-profile/etc/profile.d/nix.sh

in your shell.

thank you so much

nixos-discourse commented 11 months ago

This issue has been mentioned on NixOS Discourse. There might be relevant details there:

https://discourse.nixos.org/t/the-linux-cast-is-nixos-over-hyped/36047/2

nixos-discourse commented 10 months ago

This issue has been mentioned on NixOS Discourse. There might be relevant details there:

https://discourse.nixos.org/t/installing-nix-on-steamdeck/19349/1

OpenBagTwo commented 10 months ago

Just a PSA--nix works great on SteamOS 3.5--assuming you have sudo, it's literally just three commands:

$ curl --proto '=https' --tlsv1.2 -sSfL https://nixos.org/nix/install -o nix-install.sh
$ ./nix-install.sh --daemon
$ sudo sytemctl enable --now nix-daemon

though note I'm having an issue where I need to start the daemon after each boot. :man_shrugging:

As per the Arch Wiki, for graphical applications, you'll need NixGL. And if you want to launch your application via Steam (from gaming mode), instructions for creating a launcher can be found here.

I've written up my experience with Hyprland here and have been dailying my system for about two months (though note that at the moment there seems to be some issue with either NixGL or Hyprland 0.33-0.34 that's registering as a graphics driver mismatch).

bertogg commented 10 months ago

though note I'm having an issue where I need to start the daemon after each boot. 🤷‍♂️

Hi @OpenBagTwo , this has already been discussed several times in this thread, see here for example: https://github.com/NixOS/nix/issues/7173#issuecomment-1822622214

NixOS / nix

Steam Deck support #7173