Nix team and nixpkgs relationship

NixOS / nix

Nix, the purely functional package manager

https://nixos.org/

GNU Lesser General Public License v2.1

12.05k stars 1.47k forks source link

Nix team and nixpkgs relationship #9784

Open zimbatm opened 7 months ago

zimbatm commented 7 months ago

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

Whenever the Nix team releases a new version, it takes a while for nixpkgs to catch up. At the same time, nixpkgs often finds regression in Nix that would have been good to know before cutting a release. Something is missing in the process to make that smoother.

Describe the solution you'd like

I'm not set on something specific. Here are some ideas:

Add the Nix team to the nixpkgs CODEOWNERS so you control the cadence of the releases? See for example https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/280092
Have a dedicated Hydra nixpkgs+nix jobset that combines both latest branches so you can catch things earlier?
Any other ideas?

Priorities

Add :+1: to issues you find important.

thufschmitt commented 7 months ago

Fully agree with the issue :)

Not sure about a good solution though. I don't think having the Nix team as CODEOWNER would help as we do releases when we think they are ready, and we probably wouldn't catch more regression just by doing the Nixpkgs update ourselves.

Something about some better hydra checks would help a lot indeed (related: https://github.com/NixOS/nix/issues/9741, https://github.com/NixOS/nix/issues/9744, https://github.com/NixOS/nix/issues/9743). It wouldn't be perfect since Hydra isn't meant to change the Nix version used, so the only tests that might exert the new Nix will be the tests that run Nix in a VM. But still much better than what we have right now.

Ericson2314 commented 7 months ago

@roberth has done a lot of deep diving into this recently.

zimbatm commented 7 months ago

Ok. Let me know if you need anything from the infra team.

thufschmitt commented 7 months ago

Just discussed that during the Nix maintainers meeting today:

@roberth willing to spend some time to improve the situation from the CI side
Suggestion of having the Nix maintainers do the Nix releases on Nixpkgs:
- Currently some confusion about the responsibilities of people
- Maybe we should be more involved?
- Having a good CI would diminish the need for that a lot
- To reconsider if improving the CI isn't enough

zimbatm commented 7 months ago

Sweet! By the way, GitHub recently doubled the number of resources on the runners, and also now supports nested virtualization.

nixos-discourse commented 7 months ago

This issue has been mentioned on NixOS Discourse. There might be relevant details there:

https://discourse.nixos.org/t/2024-01-19-nix-team-meeting-minutes-116/38837/1