Open logicskky opened 5 months ago
Beside the verbose above, the use of nix realisation
instead of nix realization
also seems weird to me.
I think convenience and consistency should both be emphasized when designing the CLI.
Note: "realisation" and "realise" are common accepted forms in UK English. See also "analyse", "recognise", etc, which are all common in UK (and Australian) English, and Nix's use of the -ise forms is generally consistent. I can only find one -ize form reference in the Nix manual: https://github.com/NixOS/nix/blob/d857914e1a41670893d6571726588659afe7b1e9/doc/manual/src/command-ref/nix-store/query.md?plain=1#L97
nix-store --realise
and nix-store --realize
are both accepted, however, the same should probably done for nix realisation
Nix's use of the -ise forms is generally consistent.
I didn't realize it before. In this case, I don't think it weird anymore.
Problem: Some subcommands of
nix
are too long.Solution: Apply widely-used abbreviations instead (like
nix fmt
). e.g.nix dev
instead ofnix develop
nix drv
instead ofnix derivation
For other subcommands which is long, I haven't come up with abbrs yet, but I hope they could been shortened.