Closed the-furry-hubofeverything closed 11 months ago
samueldr
commented
11 months ago Since the license was a problem, I'm looking at the details of the new one to confirm it is indeed CC0. I'm concerned by the fact that I can't find anything on the page that states its license clearly, other than the "Free to use" link, which is the same than on the previous image.
Where did you see it was CC0?
(As far as the composition goes, it is just fine.)
the-furry-hubofeverything
commented
11 months ago Since the license was a problem, I'm looking at the details of the new one to confirm it is indeed CC0. I'm concerned by the fact that I can't find anything on the page that states its license clearly, other than the "Free to use" link, which is the same than on the previous image.
Where did you see it was CC0?
(As far as the composition goes, it is just fine.)
Oh my god
You're right
This is a nightmare ðŸ˜
Example of a cc0 image hosted in pexel: https://www.pexels.com/photo/aerial-photography-of-cloudy-mountain-7919/
I confused the alt text symbol for the license
Pexel sucks
This time I checked the licensing for the stock image. The stock photo in #106 has potential issues with its "Pexel" license, so moved away from it.
Artworks under CC BY-SA 4.0, same as #106. This is also exported with a higher resolution, at 225 dpi at 1254x1088.
Stock image from Pexels, "A Tapir in the Mud" by Aart Prikker, which is under CC0. It just so happens that the stock image that caught my eye was from Pexels, it's not preferential - I used the google filter for creative commons images.
As before, Inkscape project file is included as
tapir.svg. Krita file (for stock photo edits) is available by request.