Open ahmedtd opened 7 years ago
Any news on this issue?
I think the regexp in the issue is still too permissive (we also escape +
as _plus_
now); but apparently the attribute names are now safe.
Thank you for your contributions.
This has been automatically marked as stale because it has had no activity for 180 days.
If this is still important to you, we ask that you leave a comment below. Your comment can be as simple as "still important to me". This lets people see that at least one person still cares about this. Someone will have to do this at most twice a year if there is no other activity.
Here are suggestions that might help resolve this more quickly:
Some autogenerated quicklisp packages have invalid attribute names (according to nix commit
b0cb11722626e906a73f10dd9a0c9eea29faf43a
). Basically, attribute names must validate according to this regex:[A-Za-z_][A-Za-z0-9-_+]*
.I have worked up a patch for
ql-to-nix.lisp
that should fix the issue, but I can't figure out how it's meant to be run.@7c6f434c, since it looks like he wrote this system.