Open davidak opened 4 years ago
Thank you for your contributions.
This has been automatically marked as stale because it has had no activity for 180 days.
If this is still important to you, we ask that you leave a comment below. Your comment can be as simple as "still important to me". This lets people see that at least one person still cares about this. Someone will have to do this at most twice a year if there is no other activity.
Here are suggestions that might help resolve this more quickly:
this is still an issue
I marked this as stale due to inactivity. → More info
still an issue
I marked this as stale due to inactivity. → More info
still an issue
The package index that we use to generate the nix expressions unfortunately lack the title field for the packages. These are available in the package tarball (DESCRIPTION) so we could address this by unpacking the tarballs and pulling out the title. We already fetch the tarballs to compute a sha256 hash so this isn't difficult, though it would be an increase in resource requirements for updating.
The package index that we use to generate the nix expressions unfortunately lack the title field for the packages.
can that be changed?
These are available in the package tarball (DESCRIPTION) so we could address this by unpacking the tarballs
i would say use the best method to solve the problem, but it's not an option to not solve it because it takes too much resources
I marked this as stale due to inactivity. → More info
Describe the bug
All rPackages from
cran-packages.nix
missing adescription
andlongDescription
.https://nixos.org/nixos/packages.html?channel=nixos-19.09&query=rPackages
The CRAN website provides a description, but it's sometimes very long.
For example:
fortunes: "A collection of fortunes from the R community." (perfect for
description
) abc: "Implements several ABC algorithms for performing parameter estimation, model selection, and goodness-of-fit. Cross-validation tools are also available for measuring the accuracy of ABC estimates, and to calculate the misclassification probabilities of different models." (very long, maybe OK forlongDescription
. maye split by '.' and use the first sentence fordescription
? might be better than nothing)Perfect would be if they provide a short and long description as structured data.
cc @jabranham