kkwan0
commented
2 years ago Peer evaluation Kurtis Kwan, Score: 9.5/5 Create Task - The planning is clear and easy to follow. The create task is fully implemented in the project as a PBL feature. I can see the javascript in the html file. I like how you included the questions in the written response. I also liked how you included captions in the video. I think that you did include all parts of the answer for the written response, so I would give you a 5/5. Final Team Grading - The theme seems to be consistent throughout, but there are some minor inconsistancies. The blueprints are shown. I agree that there is no Asynch operation for the CRUD, and that the MVC is not entirely clear. The google search is clearly shown. I can see the scrumboard, but the video does not show the scrumboard. The project is deployed. I would give a 4.5/5
PEER EVALUTION SCORE: 9.5/10
Peer Evaluation; partner Kurtis Kwan
Self Evaluation Ritvik Keerthi
SELF EVALUATION SCORE: 9.3/10
For Create Task Project --> Has all required features with brief description of each. All links are fully functioning and redirect to a completed version of what the assignment is. Final program code is linked to github repository, The wiki/jekyll page is fully detailed and shows evidence of time and effort put towards this Create Task Project. further showing use of create task incorporated into the PBL. Could write more for written responses, so 4.9/5.
For Team Final Grading --> Has all required features with brief description of each. 1 min video is skillfully recorded and demonstrates all features that are required. Highlights multiple key features, rather than just one. Overall, CRUD/Search is very clear in the video, as it represents all aspect of CRUD(Create, Read, Update, Delete). CRUD Async Operation is not in program (-0.5). However, MVC is not extremely clear as it only applies to model as shown in video. Google search is implemented in the video and is fully functional, while the scrum board is complete and neatly organized. There is clear quality of information and it is easy to find all aspects shown in the video. The video is recorded on the deployed website, showing the 24/7 deployed website. 4.4/5.
Individual/Pair Evaluation - 5 pts
[x] Wiki/Jekyll page with design ideas and usage - Clear wiki page with outline of Create Task. Gives ideas of what to improve on, as well as all collegeboard features that are specifically met.
[x] Create Performance Task PBL feature - Create Task already implemented into PBL website as a key feature. Running and functioning asynchronously.
[x] Final committed program code showing algorithms written in JS/Python - final program code written in javascript linked in github repo, shows algorithms (line 496 specifically)
[x] Written responses to CollegeBoard prompts - Link to all written responses, with questions written out in wiki.
[x] 1 min video that meets CB Create Task requirements - Link to under 1 min video under 30 MB fits all requirements
Team Final Grading Considerations - 5 pts PBL Github pages. Jekyll, WIKI, live review focus
Runtime Features shown in 1 min video