Closed stephenrawls closed 9 years ago
P.S. Not sure how you want to handle the phase 1 branch, but this bug is also present in the phase 1 branch.
Thanks Stephen this looks good to me. I'll update the phase1 branch once you merge this.
Ben
Hi Ben. I removed the now obsolete variable as suggested. Do you mean I should merge into the master branch? I'm still new to github and unsure of the correct protocol--I created a feature branch for my pull request because I thought maybe that's what I was supposed to do. Should I have instead just given a pull request for the master branch?
Hi Stephen, yes I did mean to merge into the biometrics:master
, which I've just realized that you cannot since you don't have write access. Sorry about that!
Hi Ben,
Sorry for the confusion, I thought you meant I was suppose to merge into master, which I was unsure of how to do (e.g. merge into master in my fork? how would that effect this pull request?).
Looks like you merged into master, so that's good.
Quick question: should we send a courtesy e-mail to dev@libjanus.org to point folks to this change in case other teams encounter the bug?
Thanks! Stephen
Yes if you could send a quick email to the mailing list that would be appreciated, thanks!
Ok will do. Just to confirm: you are going to change phase1 branch as well? Or do I need to issue another pull request?
No I will change the phase1 branch, thanks.
Hi Janus Dev Team,
In testing our API I ran into a segfault in the case where the number of actual returned search results was less than the number of requested returned search results.
I ended up tracing the problem to a bug in janus_io.cpp. Essentially the similarity_matrix array was being indexed as if the code were accessing it from the start of the array, but really the similarity_matrix pointer was getting incremented during the loop so the indexing should have been relative to the current row.
This pull request fixes that bug. It also adds an extra check to see if the janus_search function ended up returning more search results than requested. I just figured if I was making changes I might as well add this check in as well.
Thanks, Stephen Rawls (ISI)