xmarteo
commented
5 hours ago Thanks, I think the "sunt" was added to the Breviary in the Renaissance in an effort to follow the Vulgate more closely, in which case, since the LRdT and Sandhofe's text is grammatically correct without the "sunt", has the same meaning as the BR text, and the adaptation of the music to the BR text is not trivial, it is grounds for using the ancient text. But I'll check when the "sunt" appeared.
Liber Responsorialis de Tempore, pg. 534 Resp. Angustiae mihi
=> The response is the lamentation of Susanna (Daniel 13:22). The text in the LRdT begins, Angustiae mihi undique... [So also Sanhofer]
...but the Vetus Vulgatus and the Breviarium Romanum read, Angustiae mihi sunt undique...