Closed mweimerskirch closed 2 years ago
Hi, thanks for your PR.
My first thought was: Why don't we upgrade to bullseye? It ships borgbackup 1.1.16 - I'll build a test image f
Here you go: https://github.com/Nold360/docker-borgserver/tree/upgrade/bullseye Image: nold360/borgserver:bullseye
Also fixed a little permission bug
Sadly I don't have a real testing setup anymore, since i upgraded to Kubernetes. But i did a quick test & everything looks fine so far.
My first thought was: Why don't we upgrade to bullseye? It ships borgbackup 1.1.16 - I'll build a test image
Good question. I've been using the backport for a couple of weeks and just sent it in today. I wasn't aware that Bullseye got released in the mean time 🙈
Here you go: https://github.com/Nold360/docker-borgserver/tree/upgrade/bullseye Image: nold360/borgserver:bullseye
Cool
Sadly I don't have a real testing setup anymore, since i upgraded to Kubernetes. But i did a quick test & everything looks fine so far.
I have a testing setup, but won't have time for the next two weeks. I'll give it a spin afterwards.
Will be fixed by #13
I noticed that the version of borgbackup that comes with Debian Buster is quite old: 1.1.9 (see https://packages.debian.org/buster/borgbackup). Given that there have been many improvements since then, I decided to upgrade to the version from Debian's backports repository instead. The version available here is 1.1.15 (see https://packages.debian.org/buster-backports/borgbackup).
Note that the version 1.1.9 included with Debian Buster already contains a fix for the index corruption bug that was fixed with 1.1.11 in the regular release (see https://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/changelogs/main/b/borgbackup/borgbackup_1.1.9-2+deb10u1_changelog).
Not sure if this is of general interest, so feel free not to merge it. Nevertheless, it could be useful for some people so I decided to share it nevertheless.