Closed jmaerz closed 7 months ago
@mvertens, @JorgSchwinger and @TomasTorsvik : I suspect that we should briefly talk about the tagging during the BLOM core meeting tmw. Any opinion on this @JorgSchwinger? - see also discussion #295. Wrt the regression testing: I would be happy to incorporate the automated regression testing in my daily routine of coding (thus far mainly manually done). I hope that the full support will be available through the NorESM2.1 release. Wrt to specific testcases, I see that some combinations are probably needed - particularly in combination with the hybrid coordinates, at some point potentially with the new SI units, potentially a combination of HAMOCC logicals and potentially wrt to air-sea fluxes.
Wrt to merging #314 and #315, I'll wait a bit longer today for Tomas, but I suspect that he's busy with the workshop so that I merge the stuff in the afternoon.
I don't have any strong opinion on the tagging-question. Using vX.Y.Z
and updating z automatically sounds ok to me. But I'm fine with whatever is decided tomorrow (I can't make it)
@JorgSchwinger , ok, thanks for the input on the tagging. I suspect it will be a decision between Mats and Mariana then.
I performed another regression testing between an earlier stage of the feature-hamocc_beyond-CMIP6
branch and the latest stage that we will merge with this PR into master
. It looked all good and we are all set for merging the PR, making master
ready for the NorESM2.1.
This PR breaks CMIP6 backward compatibility since it introduces a few bugfixes to
master
:This PR makes
master
ready for the NorESM2.1 milestone (at least from the iHAMOCC point of view).