Add new physics category for publishing new simulations (p4)

[oyvindseland]

Hi

I am planning to publish a project intercomparison with CMIP6 forcings but different physics using NorESM2-LM. Suggested experiment id convention already started by EC-Earth is to use "p4" in the label e.g. the historical simulation is to be given variant_label=r1i1p4f1 It will be on the order of 10 experiments with a mix of coupled and atmosphere/land only experiments. The expected (and mostly finished) coupled simulations are piControl, historical, 1 pct CO2 and SSP245. There will be one or two historical with prescribed SST and a number of 30 year long AMIP simulations.

Is the naming convention easily included in noresm2cmor? Since it is a project with no participation from Bergen should / must I organize the cmorization and / or publication myself?

@YanchunHe @lisesg

[YanchunHe]

Yes, r1i1p4f1 is easily given.

However, please note, r1i1p4f1 is realisation (or variant_label, or ensemble), not experiment_id. The experiment_id should exactly be the same as already defined, e.g., historical or 1pctCO2.

Therefore, in summary, we can say, experiment_id = historical, variant_label=r1i1p4f1 will work.

[YanchunHe]

Please submit cmorize request issues. One issue for one experiment, but can have several experiment with different variant_label.

[oyvindseland]

Yes, sorry I mixed the expressions. experiment_id is of course as you say the definition of the experiment itself.

Will submit request issues specifying use of variant_label r1i1p4f1

[oyvindseland]

Will add experiment_rip in the cmorisation request. typically as above, r1i1p4f1

[oyvindseland]

Based in the discussions here I am creating individual cmorization and publications requests. Closing this issue