i have a DTO class in client side. if i am getting fields with
classType.getFields() it returns with incorrect order.
Sample DTO class :
package gov.egmidb.ziyaretci.client.dto;
import java.util.Date;
import java.util.HashSet;
import java.util.Set;
import com.gwtent.reflection.client.Reflectable;
@Reflectable
public class TestDTO extends AbstractDTO {
private Long id;
private Date startDate;
private Date endDate;
private String description;
private Set<String> guests = new HashSet<String>();
public Long getId() {
return id;
}
public void setId(Long id) {
this.id = id;
}
public Date getStartDate() {
return startDate;
}
public void setStartDate(Date startDate) {
this.startDate = startDate;
}
public Date getEndDate() {
return endDate;
}
public void setEndDate(Date endDate) {
this.endDate = endDate;
}
public String getDescription() {
return description;
}
public void setDescription(String description) {
this.description = description;
}
public Set<String> getGuests() {
return guests;
}
public void setGuests(Set<String> guests) {
this.guests = guests;
}
}
And getting fields with getField() method:
ClassType classType= TypeOracle.Instance.getClassType(TestDTO.class);
Fields[] fields = classType.getFields();
for(Field field : fields){
System.out.println(field.getName()+", "+field.getType().getSimpleSourceName());
}
And the output is:
id, java.lang.Long
startDate, java.util.Date
description, java.lang.String
guests, java.util.Set
endDate, java.util.Date
But i think it should be as the same order with fields of TestDTO class like
this:
id, java.lang.Long
startDate, java.util.Date
endDate, java.util.Date
description, java.lang.String
guests, java.util.Set
i am using gwt 2.1 and gwtent 1.0.0RC1 but because of an issue i mannually get
the r720 of gwtent.jar from svn repo and using it.
In the class com.gwtent.reflection.client.impl.ClassTypeImpl.java there is a
field property that is defined as HashMap. May be changing it as LinkedHashMap
should solve this issue.
Original issue reported on code.google.com by yavuzt...@gmail.com on 30 Dec 2010 at 10:03
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
yavuzt...@gmail.com
on 30 Dec 2010 at 10:03Attachments: