Closed jonlachmann closed 1 year ago
Thanks! I agree this is useful for devel purposes (which is the reason for putting it in there in the first place). However, I am unsure whether it is wise to add another argument to explain()
, as there are already quite many. I will leave this open for now, while thinking it through.
Closing for now as only useful for development (and there are already many arguments in explain()
)
For debugging purposes it seemed beneficial to be able to use the non-parallel version of the code. It is also useful if many parallel explanations are run, to avoid over-subscription of the available cores (i.e. running more threads than cores, causing slowdowns).