Open Texernie opened 6 years ago
@Texernie As stated in the PR comment, we would like this to be an extensibility point.
@anangaur I can definitely see your point. I am more than happy to re-implement the AWS solution using the extensibility point. I don't have the bandwidth to fully develop the fully extensibility point though.
Hi,
I've got some time and could use this, what extensibility point would you be looking for? Whatis the PR number and I'll definitely be able to help. Sean.b
@SeanFarrow , Anand is talking about changing how the backends are registered into extensibility points. The feature is #5982, which would encompass the current backends of Azure and local file system. My PR #5799 had the AWS specific backend in it, but was inlined without the extensibility points.
Reopening #2871 for PR.