Open dubnemo opened 2 years ago
https://www.asyncapi.com/docs/tutorials/getting-started/coming-from-openapi
This seems to provide a high level mapping.
AsyncAPI supports variety protocols such as WebSockets, HTTP, Apache Kafka, MQTT, etc. Each protocol has defined own message exchange flow, which makes the schema definition can vary. Do you have any preferences for it?
Let's keep this in the backlog for now. I want to review CloudEvents work first.
I would much prefer get closer to the finish line on OpenAPI. See the issue I created the other day.
And Protobuf has probably more impact than AsyncAPI.
On Thu, May 11, 2023, 1:28 PM Hakju Oh @.***> wrote:
AsyncAPI supports variety protocols such as WebSockets, HTTP, Apache Kafka, MQTT, etc. Each protocol has defined own message exchange flow, which makes the schema definition can vary. Do you have any preferences for it?
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/OAGi/Score/issues/1316#issuecomment-1544485854, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AHXOQO3SMGHJTEW2ZFPBI6TXFUVVLANCNFSM57L2IS3A . You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: @.***>
https://www.asyncapi.com/
Documentation https://www.asyncapi.com/docs/reference/specification/v2.4.0 Leverages OpenAPI
Curious to understand the differences between this and callback approaches in OpenApI.