Open beckyjackson opened 2 years ago
I would bet that this was an accident. But it reminds me that we have to be careful when doing the mapping to OBI, where what we have as 'planned process' is really 'completely executed'. Which further reminds me that we should do an OBI-COB alignment.
In
cob-to-external.tsv
, 'planned process' has the ID COB:0000035: https://github.com/OBOFoundry/COB/blob/a2f7141c1e30e87352cb656a224fd31027d92701/src/ontology/components/cob-to-external.tsv#L69... but in the COB file, this is COB:0000082: https://github.com/OBOFoundry/COB/blob/a2f7141c1e30e87352cb656a224fd31027d92701/cob.owl#L726-L744
In
cob-edit.owl
, COB:0000035 is 'completely executed planned process' so can we either update the ID or label in the external mapping file? I don't know if this mapping was intended to be to the completely-executed one or not. @cmungall ?