Open wdduncan opened 2 years ago
Unfortunately there still seem to be problems with the exposure class. Unfortunately also these problems are vocalised on various private chats.
I thought the PR was approved and merged b/c we (the COB collective) had decided that the exposure to organism
class was deemed adequate.
Am I mistaken?
I think it's fine, but give it a week for the dust to settle. I think the word "entity" in the definition is causing concern people make mistake the class for being restricted to exposure to physical entities..
I don't think I am part of any private chat regarding this (if I am someone please link me to it). I suspect Bill isn't either. So it would be quite helpful if any problems that lead people to object to the minimal compromise we have so far will be added to the public discussion.
On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 12:35 PM Nico Matentzoglu @.***> wrote:
Unfortunately there still seem to be problems with the exposure class. Unfortunately also these problems are vocalised on various private chats.
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/OBOFoundry/COB/issues/210#issuecomment-1219875345, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADJX2IXASSM5PPYVVXHYXNDVZ2F6ZANCNFSM5656GPQA . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>
-- Bjoern Peters Professor La Jolla Institute for Immunology 9420 Athena Circle La Jolla, CA 92037, USA Tel: 858/752-6914 Fax: 858/752-6987 http://www.liai.org/pages/faculty-peters
@bpeters42 No, I am not part of such conversations :(
It would be great if we can make a release so that I close the related RO issue.
Forget my comment. Since no one spoke up in public, just move forward now..
Thanks @matentzn
Do you know who is responsible for making a COB release?
In #192 we approved the the addition of the
exposure of organism
class. This class is now present incob-edit
. In RO PR 606 we are wanting to use theexposure of organism
class.Are there plans to make a release of COB, so that other ontologies can properly reference this class?
@cmungall @bpeters42 @matentzn