I have no strong opinions about whether this should be merged, the PR is in part to demonstrate a claim in 220.
I tend to think that if we include a class disposition then we should include complete axioms for it, but it's not clear that high level groupings like disposition do any work in COB, and maybe we should but out this grouping
I don't think it should be a disjoint union. Realizable was deliberately left open because of the expectation that there would be other subclasses, such as power.
See #220 for full context
I have no strong opinions about whether this should be merged, the PR is in part to demonstrate a claim in 220.
I tend to think that if we include a class disposition then we should include complete axioms for it, but it's not clear that high level groupings like disposition do any work in COB, and maybe we should but out this grouping