Open pbuttigieg opened 4 years ago
This should be added to the agenda for an upcoming OBO operations meeting.
Can note when there is overlapping scope, agreed this is a good idea on the Operations call. @pbuttigieg will put in some text for this proposal.
This principle is sometimes hard to match to ontologies like ENVO: it sounds like a solid scope, but - because of the nature of the entities of interest (e.g. environments) - can creep and lead to shadow hierarchies. We're learning how to avoid these and are happy to give away branches to new groups (FOODON, AgrO, etc), but adding a section on these sort of cases may save some time.
Proposal
Other points? This likely needs some general discussion in Operations...