search

OBOFoundry / OBOFoundry.github.io

Metadata and website for the Open Bio Ontologies Foundry Ontology Registry
http://obofoundry.org
Other
164 stars 201 forks source link

Domain gaps in OBO Foundry #601

Closed jamesaoverton closed 2 years ago

jamesaoverton commented 6 years ago

From @GoogleCodeExporter on August 12, 2015 2:3

As per older meeting discussions, the Editorial WG should create a list of 
domain gaps in the OBO Foundry. Which domains, which are currently not covered 
in an OBO library ontology, would allow for better logical inference or more 
complete data annotation?

Original issue reported on code.google.com by rlwalls2...@gmail.com on 16 Aug 2013 at 11:27

Copied from original issue: OBOFoundry/Operations-Committee-RETIRED#100

jamesaoverton commented 6 years ago

From @GoogleCodeExporter on August 12, 2015 2:3

Original comment by mcour...@gmail.com on 16 Oct 2013 at 7:59

nlharris commented 4 years ago

i don't know, this seems borderline out of scope to me and unlikely to ever get done. i would vote to just close it as "won't do".

nataled commented 2 years ago

I agree with @nlharris to close. In a sense, the work with COB will allow us to see gaps more clearly. @jamesaoverton do you agree?

jamesaoverton commented 2 years ago

My name is on this issue because I run the issue migration tool, but the issue was created by @ramonawalls and/or @mcourtot. However I agree that it's fine to close this very old issue.

nataled commented 2 years ago

In that case I'm going to close it. It did indeed come from Ramona, and it was because the EWG many years ago thought this was something we should do. At the time we didn't really have a good way to do it, so it languished. We needed to have that 'domain' metadata tag fleshed out and have all ontologies provide an ACCURATE indication of the domain. As mentioned, once we have COB fully done and annotated with ontologies, the objective indicated in this issue will easily fall from that.