OBOFoundry / Operations-Committee-RETIRED

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/obo-foundry-operations-committee
1 stars 0 forks source link

Discuss how best to deal with Philippe's request re Susanna's role #159

Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 6 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
(I think the Outreach group is the most suitable one here.)

Philippe says: "Thank you for the message. We would still be interested in this 
owing to the current involvement with publishers and an IMI project (eTRIKS).

However, it is essential that the OBO Foundry defines more clearly the remit of 
such function (promotion of OBO foundry resources to industry partners, seeking 
funds and financial support,...) and clarify how the foundry would prioritize 
efforts if confronted with requests from industry (assuming they have made a 
financial contribution)."

Original issue reported on code.google.com by batchelorc@rsc.org on 14 Nov 2014 at 1:29

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Richard will invite Susanna to the next Outreach call in December, so we can 
discuss what OBO Foundry has been doing and how she might like to contribute to 
outreach to industry.

Original comment by rlwalls2...@gmail.com on 19 Nov 2014 at 7:07

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Update from Susanna and Philippe: "To be clear, I would suggest that Philippe 
and I share this role, as he has direct involvement with pharmas (via his role 
in eTRIKS) on ontologies, and I can help with links to publishers."

Original comment by batchelorc@rsc.org on 8 Dec 2014 at 3:33

jamesaoverton commented 6 years ago

https://github.com/OBOFoundry/OBOFoundry.github.io/issues/599