Open bosd opened 11 months ago
@Dranyel-Bosd Can you please review?
@etobella Can you please merge?
Improved coverage @etobella it is ready now
This PR has the approved
label and has been created more than 5 days ago. It should therefore be ready to merge by a maintainer (or a PSC member if the concerned addon has no declared maintainer). 🤖
ping @JordiBForgeFlow Can you have a look here / merge? 🙏
/ocabot merge patch
Let's proceed with merge in order to avoid delay (we have given enough time)
On my way to merge this fine PR! Prepared branch 14.0-ocabot-merge-pr-1733-by-etobella-bump-patch, awaiting test results.
@etobella your merge command was aborted due to failed check(s), which you can inspect on this commit of 14.0-ocabot-merge-pr-1733-by-etobella-bump-patch.
After fixing the problem, you can re-issue a merge command. Please refrain from merging manually as it will most probably make the target branch red.
The depreciation table can already be edited before confirming an asset.
But we cannot edit a running asset. Which is quite common to do in some countries. So, I think we need this.
@JordiBForgeFlow @kittiu What do you think?
@bosd I also think that we need this.
I'm aborting the merge and check this deeply proposing the implementation today.
@pedrobaeza Which changes would you like to see?
@bosd IMHO I think the current one that edit before submit is good enough. I think I am too concern with performance when dealing with lots of asset. Will this store false account into it?
If not, I think this can be a good feature.
Update: Changed the fields back to stored.
- The number of commits is not acceptable.
I have squashed the commits of @JordiBForgeFlow . The other commits I kept in place to retain author ship.
Renamed the commit messages.
@pedrobaeza Is this one ok now?
Forward port of https://github.com/OCA/account-financial-tools/pull/1208 continuation of #1237